J. P. Barthélemy and A. Guénoche, Les arbres et les représentations des proximités, 1988.

B. R. Baum, Combining Trees as a Way of Combining Data Sets for Phylogenetic Inference, and the Desirability of Combining Gene Trees, Taxon, vol.41, issue.1, pp.3-10, 1992.
DOI : 10.2307/1222480

M. Bourque, Arbres de Steiner et réseaux dont varie l'emplagement de certains sommets, 1978.

V. Daubin, M. Gouy, and G. Perrière, A Phylogenomic Approach to Bacterial Phylogeny: Evidence of a Core of Genes Sharing a Common History, Genome Research, vol.12, issue.7, pp.1080-1090, 2002.
DOI : 10.1101/gr.187002

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00427259

G. and D. Soete, Additive-tree representations of incomplete dissimilarity data, Quality and Quantity, vol.18, issue.4, pp.387-393, 1984.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00227594

R. Desper and O. Gascuel, Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle, Journal of Computational Biology, vol.19, issue.5, pp.687-705, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00269513

G. Devulder, M. Pérouse-de-montclos, and J. P. Flandrois, A multigene approach to phylogenetic analysis using the genus Mycobacterium as a model, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY, vol.55, issue.1, pp.293-302, 2005.
DOI : 10.1099/ijs.0.63222-0

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00427738

J. A. Eisen and C. M. Fraser, Phylogenomics: Intersection of Evolution and Genomics, Science, vol.300, issue.5626, pp.1706-1707, 2003.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1086292

G. F. Estabrook, F. R. Mcmorris, and C. A. Meacham, Comparison of Undirected Phylogenetic Trees Based on Subtrees of Four Evolutionary Units, Systematic Zoology, vol.34, issue.2, pp.193-200, 1985.
DOI : 10.2307/2413326

O. Eulenstein, D. Chen, J. G. Burleigh, D. Fernandez-baca, and M. J. Sanderson, Performance of Flip Supertree Construction with a Heuristic Algorithm, Systematic Biology, vol.53, issue.2, pp.299-308, 2004.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150490423719

J. Felsenstein, PHYLIP : Phylogeny inference package, version 3.6. Distributed by the author, 1993.

O. Gascuel, A note on Sattath and Tversky's, Saitou ans Nei's and Studier and Keppler's algorithms for inferring phylogenies from evolutionary distances, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol.11, issue.6, pp.961-963, 1994.

O. Gascuel, BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol.14, issue.7, pp.685-695, 1997.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025808

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00730410

J. Gatesy, C. Matthee, R. Desalle, and C. Hayashi, Resolution of a Supertree/Supermatrix Paradox, Systematic Biology, vol.51, issue.4, pp.652-664, 2002.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150290102311

P. Goloboff, J. Farris, and K. Nixon, TNT : Tree analysis using new technology, 2003.

S. Guindon and O. Gascuel, A Simple, Fast, and Accurate Algorithm to Estimate Large Phylogenies by Maximum Likelihood, Systematic Biology, vol.52, issue.5, pp.696-704, 2003.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150390235520

A. Guénoche and S. Grandcolas, Approximations par arbre d'une distance partielle [tree adjustments for partial distances, Mathématiques, Informatique et Sciences humaines, pp.51-64, 1999.

J. P. Huelsenbeck, When are fossils better than extant taxa in phylogenetic analysis? Systematic Zoology, pp.458-469, 2001.

M. Kearney, Fragmentary Taxa, Missing Data, and Ambiguity: Mistaken Assumptions and Conclusions, Systematic Biology, vol.51, issue.2, pp.369-381, 2002.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150252899824

F. Lapointe and G. Cucumel, The Average Consensus Procedure: Combination of Weighted Trees Containing Identical or Overlapping Sets of Taxa, Systematic Biology, vol.46, issue.2, pp.306-312, 1997.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/46.2.306

F. Lapointe and C. Levasseur, Everything You always wanted to Know about the Average Consensus, and More, Phylogenetic supertrees : Combining information to reveal the tree of life. Kluwer Academic, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4020-2330-9_5

O. Madsen, M. Scally, C. J. Douady, D. J. Kao, R. W. Debry et al., Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals, Nature, issue.6820, pp.409610-614, 2001.

S. A. Mahon, A molecular supertree of the Artiodactyla Phylogenetic supertrees : Combining information to reveal the tree of life, Kluwer Academic, 2004.

V. Makarenkov, T-REX: reconstructing and visualizing phylogenetic trees and reticulation networks, Bioinformatics, vol.17, issue.7, pp.664-668, 2001.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.7.664

V. Makarenkov and F. Lapointe, A weighted least-squares approach for inferring phylogenies from incomplete distance matrices, Bioinformatics, vol.20, issue.13, pp.2113-2121, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth211

V. Makarenkov and B. Leclerc, An Algorithm for the Fitting of a Tree Metric According to a Weighted Least-Squares Criterion, Journal of Classification, vol.16, issue.1, pp.3-26, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/s003579900040

H. Philippe, E. A. Snell, E. Bapteste, P. Lopez, P. W. Holland et al., Phylogenomics of Eukaryotes: Impact of Missing Data on Large Alignments, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol.21, issue.9, pp.1740-1752, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/molbev/msh182

T. Pupko, D. Huchon, Y. Cao, N. Okada, and M. Hasegawa, Combining Multiple Data Sets in a Likelihood Analysis: Which Models are the Best?, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol.19, issue.12, pp.2294-2307, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004053

M. A. Ragan, Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol.1, issue.1, pp.53-58, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/1055-7903(92)90035-F

A. Rambaut and N. C. Grassly, Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees, Bioinformatics, vol.13, issue.3, pp.235-238, 1997.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/13.3.235

D. Robinson and L. Foulds, Comparison of weighted labelled trees, Lectures Notes in Mathematics, vol.3, pp.119-126, 1979.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01797452

R. Rodriguez, J. L. Oliver, A. Marin, and J. R. Medina, The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol.142, issue.4, pp.485-501, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80104-3

N. Saitou and M. Nei, The neighbor-joining method : a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees, Molecular Biology Evolution, vol.4, pp.406-425, 1987.

M. J. Sanderson, r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock, Bioinformatics, vol.19, issue.2, pp.301-302, 2003.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301

H. A. Schmidt, Phylogenetic Trees from Large Datasets, 2003.

H. A. Schmidt, K. Strimmer, M. Vingron, and A. Haeseler, TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing, Bioinformatics, vol.18, issue.3, pp.502-504, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.502

J. A. Studier and K. J. Keppler, A note on the neighbor-joining method of Saitou and Nei, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol.5, pp.729-731, 1988.

D. L. Swofford, PAUP* :Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony (*and other methods), version 10, 2002.

D. L. Swofford, G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis, Phylogenetic inference, Molecular Systematics, Massachussets , Sinauer Associates, 1996.

P. J. Waddell and S. Shelley, Evaluating placental inter-ordinal phylogenies with novel sequences including RAG1, ??-fibrinogen, ND6, and mt-tRNA, plus MCMC-driven nucleotide, amino acid, and codon models, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol.28, issue.2, pp.197-224, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00115-5

J. J. Wiens, Does Adding Characters with Missing Data Increase or Decrease Phylogenetic Accuracy?, Systematic Biology, vol.47, issue.4, pp.625-640, 1998.
DOI : 10.1080/106351598260635

J. J. Wiens and T. W. Reeder, Combining Data Sets with Different Numbers of Taxa for Phylogenetic Analysis, Systematic Biology, vol.44, issue.4, pp.548-558, 1995.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/44.4.548

Z. Yang, Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data, Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol.44, issue.5, pp.587-596, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02352289