E. Adams, Consensus Techniques and the Comparison of Taxonomic Trees, Systematic Biology, vol.21, issue.4, pp.390-397, 1972.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/21.4.390

A. V. Aho, Y. Sagiv, T. G. Szymanski, and J. D. Ullman, Inferring a Tree from Lowest Common Ancestors with an Application to the Optimization of Relational Expressions, SIAM Journal on Computing, vol.10, issue.3, pp.405-421, 1981.
DOI : 10.1137/0210030

H. Bandelt and A. W. Dress, Reconstructing the shape of a tree from observed dissimilarity data, Advances in Applied Mathematics, vol.7, issue.3, pp.309-343, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0196-8858(86)90038-2

B. R. Baum, Combining Trees as a Way of Combining Data Sets for Phylogenetic Inference, and the Desirability of Combining Gene Trees, Taxon, vol.41, issue.1, pp.3-10, 1992.
DOI : 10.2307/1222480

B. R. Baum and M. A. Ragan, The MRP method. Pages 17?34 in Phylogenetic supertrees: combining information to reveal the Tree of Life Kluwer, 2004.

V. Berry and O. Gascuel, Inferring evolutionary trees with strong combinatorial evidence, Theor. Comput. Sci, vol.240, pp.217-298, 2000.

V. Berry, S. Guillemot, F. Nicolas, and C. Paul, On the Approximation of Computing Evolutionary Trees, Proceedings of the 11th International Computing and Combinatorics Conference (COCOON'05) (L. Wang, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11533719_14
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00106451

V. Berry and F. Nicolas, Maximum agreement and compatible supertrees, pp.205-219, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00108782

V. Berry and C. Semple, Fast Computation of Supertrees for Compatible Phylogenies with Nested Taxa, Systematic Biology, vol.55, issue.2, pp.108-126, 2006.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150500541649
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00131854

O. R. Bininda-emonds, The evolution of supertrees, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.19, issue.6, pp.315-322, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.015

O. R. Bininda-emonds, Phylogenetic supertrees (combining information to reveal the tree of life, 2004.

O. R. Bininda-emonds and H. N. Bryant, Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses, Syst. Biol, vol.47, pp.497-508, 1998.

D. Bryant, Building trees, hunting for trees and comparing trees: theory and method in phylogenetic analysis, 1997.

D. Bryant and V. Berry, A Structured Family of Clustering and Tree Construction Methods, Advances in Applied Mathematics, vol.27, issue.4, 2001.
DOI : 10.1006/aama.2001.0758

D. Bryant, C. Semple, and M. Steel, Supertree methods for ancestral divergence dates and other applications. chap. 6, Pages 129?150 in Phylogenetic supertrees: combining information to reveal the Tree of Life, 2004.

D. Chen, L. Diao, O. Eulenstein, D. Fernández-baca, and M. J. Sanderson, Flipping: A supertree construction method, of Series in Discrete Math. and Theoretic Computer Science DIMACS Am, 2003.

J. A. Cotton, C. S. Slater, and M. Wilkinson, Discriminating Supported and Unsupported Relationships in Supertrees Using Triplets, Systematic Biology, vol.55, issue.2, pp.345-350, 2006.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150500481556

A. Criscuolo, V. Berry, E. J. Douzery, and O. Gascuel, SDM: A Fast Distance-Based Approach for (Super)Tree Building in Phylogenomics, Systematic Biology, vol.55, issue.5, pp.740-755, 2006.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150600969872
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00136655

P. Daniel, Supertree methods: some new approaches. Master's thesis University of Canter- bury, 2004.

P. Daniel and C. Semple, Supertree algorithms for nested taxa. chap. 7, Pages 151?171 in Phylogenetic supertrees: combining information to reveal the Tree of Life, 2004.

V. Daubin, M. Gouy, and G. Perrì-ere, A Phylogenomic Approach to Bacterial Phylogeny: Evidence of a Core of Genes Sharing a Common History, Genome Research, vol.12, issue.7, pp.1080-1090, 2002.
DOI : 10.1101/gr.187002
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00427259

M. C. Dekker, Reconstruction methods for derivation trees. Master's thesis University of Amsterdam, 1986.

F. Delsuc, H. Brinkmann, and H. Philippe, Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life, Nature Reviews Genetics, vol.3, issue.5, pp.361-375, 2005.
DOI : 10.1038/nrg1603
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halsde-00193293

J. Dutheil, S. Gaillard, E. Bazin, S. Glemin, V. Ranwez et al., Bio++: a set of C++ libraries for sequence analysis, phylogenetics, molecular evolution and population genetics, BMC Bioinformatics, vol.7, issue.1, p.188, 2006.
DOI : 10.1186/1471-2105-7-188
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halsde-00323971

P. A. Goloboff, Minority rule supertrees? MRP, Compatibility, and Minimum Flip may display the least frequent groups, Cladistics, vol.3, issue.3, pp.282-294, 2005.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150290102483

P. A. Goloboff and D. Pol, Semi-strict supertrees, Cladistics, vol.49, issue.5, pp.514-525, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01242-1

M. Goodman, L. I. Grossman, and D. E. Wildman, Moving primate genomics beyond the chimpanzee genome, Trends in Genetics, vol.21, issue.9, pp.511-517, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tig.2005.06.012

A. G. Gordon, Consensus supertrees: The synthesis of rooted trees containing overlapping sets of labeled leaves, Journal of Classification, vol.46, issue.2, pp.335-348, 1986.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01894195

S. Guillemot and V. Berry, Finding a largest subset of rooted triples identifying a tree is an NP-hard task, 2007.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00143208

S. Guindon and O. Gascuel, A Simple, Fast, and Accurate Algorithm to Estimate Large Phylogenies by Maximum Likelihood, Systematic Biology, vol.52, issue.5, pp.696-704, 2003.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150390235520

D. H. Huson, S. M. Nettles, and T. J. Warnow, Disk-Covering, a Fast-Converging Method for Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction, Journal of Computational Biology, vol.6, issue.3-4, pp.369-386, 1999.
DOI : 10.1089/106652799318337

K. P. Karanth, T. Delefosse, B. Rakotosamimanana, T. J. Parsons, and A. D. Yoder, Ancient DNA from giant extinct lemurs confirms single origin of Malagasy primates, Proc. Natl. Acad, 2005.
DOI : 10.1038/35072071

F. Lapointe and G. Cucumel, The Average Consensus Procedure: Combination of Weighted Trees Containing Identical or Overlapping Sets of Taxa, Systematic Biology, vol.46, issue.2, pp.306-312, 1997.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/46.2.306

E. Lerat, V. Daubin, and N. A. Moran, From gene trees to organismal phylogeny in prokaryotes: The case of the gamma-proteobacteria, PLoS Biology, vol.1, pp.101-109, 2003.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00427440

T. Margush and F. Mcmorris, Consensus-trees, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol.43, issue.2, pp.239-244, 1981.
DOI : 10.1016/S0092-8240(81)90019-7

D. A. Neumann, Faithful consensus methods for n-trees, Mathematical Biosciences, vol.63, issue.2, pp.271-287, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/0025-5564(82)90043-8

D. Pisani and M. Wilkinson, Matrix Representation with Parsimony, Taxonomic Congruence, and Total Evidence, Systematic Biology, vol.51, issue.1, pp.151-155, 2002.
DOI : 10.1080/106351502753475925

C. Poux, P. Chevret, D. Huchon, W. W. De-jong, and E. J. Douzery, Arrival and Diversification of Caviomorph Rodents and Platyrrhine Primates in South America, Systematic Biology, vol.55, issue.2, pp.228-244, 2006.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150500481390
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halsde-00252011

C. Poux and E. J. Douzery, Primate phylogeny, evolutionary rate variations, and divergence times: A contribution from the nuclear gene IRBP, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol.11, issue.1, pp.1-16, 2004.
DOI : 10.1002/ajpa.10322

A. Purvis, A Composite Estimate of Primate Phylogeny, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.348, issue.1326, pp.405-421, 1995.
DOI : 10.1098/rstb.1995.0078

A. Purvis, A Modification to Baum and Ragan's Method for Combining Phylogenetic Trees, Systematic Biology, vol.44, issue.2, pp.251-255, 1995.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/44.2.251

M. A. Ragan, Matrix representation in reconstructing phylogenetic relationships among the eukaryotes, Biosystems, vol.28, issue.1-3, pp.47-55, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0303-2647(92)90007-L

C. Roos, J. Schmitz, and H. Zischler, Primate jumping genes elucidate strepsirrhine phylogeny, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, pp.10650-10654, 2004.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1065257

H. A. Ross and A. G. Rodrigo, An Assessment of Matrix Representation with Compatibility in Supertree Construction, Phylogenetic supertrees (combining information to reveal the tree of life) (O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4020-2330-9_3

M. J. Sanderson, A. Purvis, and C. Henze, Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.13, issue.3, pp.105-109, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01242-1

C. Semple and M. Steel, A supertree method for rooted trees, Discrete Applied Mathematics, vol.105, issue.1-3, pp.147-158, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0166-218X(00)00202-X

H. Shimodaira and M. Hasegawa, Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol.16, issue.8, pp.1114-1116, 1999.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201

S. S. Singer, J. Schmitz, C. Schwiegk, and H. Zischler, Molecular cladistic markers in New World monkey phylogeny (Platyrrhini, Primates), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol.26, issue.3, pp.490-501, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00312-3

M. A. Steel, The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtree, 1992.

M. A. Steel, A. W. Dress, and S. Böcker, Simple but Fundamental Limitations on Supertree and Consensus Tree Methods, Systematic Biology, vol.49, issue.2, pp.363-368, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/49.2.363
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.23.1818

D. L. Swofford, PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods, 1998.

J. D. Thompson, T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, and D. G. Higgins, The clustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools, Nucl. Acids Res, vol.24, pp.4876-4882, 1997.

J. L. Thorley and M. Wilkinson, A view of supertrees methods. Pages 185?194 in, 2003.

M. Wilkinson, Common Cladistic Information and its Consensus Representation: Reduced Adams and Reduced Cladistic Consensus Trees and Profiles, Systematic Biology, vol.43, issue.3, pp.343-368, 1994.
DOI : 10.1093/sysbio/43.3.343

M. Wilkinson, D. Pisani, J. A. Cotton, and I. Corfe, Measuring Support and Finding Unsupported Relationships in Supertrtees, Systematic Biology, vol.54, issue.5, pp.823-831, 2005.
DOI : 10.1080/10635150590950362

M. Wilkinson, J. Thorley, D. Pisani, F. Lapointe, and O. Mcinerney, Some desiderata for liberal supertree. Pages 227?246 in Phylogenetic supertrees (combining information to reveal the tree of life), 2004.

D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder, Mammal species of the world, 2005.

O. A. Disotell, M. A. Ryder, and . Batzer, A mobile element based phylogeny of old world monkeys, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol, vol.37, pp.872-880, 2005.