J. Bhatt-rajesh and . Aravind, Semilinearity is a syntactic invariant: A reply to Michaelis and Kracht 1997, Linguistic Inquiry: 35, pp.683-692, 2004.

R. M. Bresnan-joan, S. Kaplan, A. Peters, and . Zaenen, Cross-Serial Dependencies in Dutch, pp.286-319, 1987.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-3401-6_11

B. Wojciech, Lambek Grammars based on pregroups, Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, LNAI 2099, 2001.

W. Buszkowski and . Abrusci, Cut elimination for the Lambek calculus of adjoints, Papers in formal linguistics and logic, 2002.

F. Nissim and M. Kaminski, Commutation Augmented Pregroup Grammars and Mildly Context Sensitive Languages, Studia Logica, pp.295-321, 2007.

K. Hans and U. Reyle, From Discourse to Logic, Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, 1993.

K. Marcus, Compositionality: " The Very Idea, Research in Language and Computation, pp.287-308, 2007.

M. Jens and M. Kracht, Semilinearity as a syntactic invariant, Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, pp.329-345, 1328.

L. Joachim, The mathematics of sentence structure, American Mathematical Monthly, vol.65, pp.154-170, 1958.

L. Joachim, Type Grammar revisited, Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, pp.1-27, 1582.

L. Joachim, From word to sentence, Polimetrica, 2008.

N. Joakim, Algorithms for deterministic incremental dependency parsing, Computational Linguistics, pp.513-553, 2008.

P. Mati, Lambek calculus is NP-complete, CUNY ph.D. Program in Computer Science, 2003.

P. Carl and I. A. Sag, Head-driven phrase structure grammar, 1994.

P. Anne and J. Lambek, Free compact 2-183-226, 1987 categories, Mathematical Structures for Computer Sciences, vol.17, issue.1, pp.1-32, 2007.

P. Anne, Toward Discourse Representation Via Pregroup Grammars , JoLLI, pp.173-194, 2007.

P. Geoffrey and G. Gazdar, Natural Languages and Context Free Languages, in: The Formal Complexity of Natural Language, pp.138-182, 1987.

S. Walter, E. Bach, W. Marsh, and G. Safran-naveh, Introduction to Part III, in: The Formal Complexity of Natural Language, pp.283-285, 1987.

S. Stuart and M. , Evidence Against the Context-Freeness of Natural Language, in: The Formal Complexity of Natural Language, pp.320-334, 1987.

S. Edward, Varieties of crossing dependencies: Structure dependence and mild context sensitivity, Cognitive Science, vol.28, issue.5, pp.669-720, 2004.

S. Edward, Tupled Pregroup Grammars, Computational and Algebraic Approaches to Natural Language, 2008.

S. Mark, Surface Structure and Interpretation, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph, p.30, 1996.