L. Amgoud and P. Besnard, Bridging the Gap between Abstract Argumentation Systems and Logic, International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM'09), pp.12-27, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-A

L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol, Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks, Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol.29, issue.2, pp.125-169, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1021603608656

J. Baget and M. Mugnier, The Complexity of Rules and Constraints, JAIR, vol.16, pp.425-465, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00268460

J. Baget, M. Mugnier, S. Rudolph, and M. Thomazo, Walking the complexity lines for generalized guarded existential rules, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial IntelligenceIJCAI'11), pp.712-717, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00618081

S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases, Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial intelligence (UAI'93), pp.411-419, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, Elements of Argumentation, 2008.
DOI : 10.7551/mitpress/9780262026437.001.0001

F. J. Bex, S. J. Modgil, H. Prakken, and C. Reed, On logical specifications of the Argument Interchange Format, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.23, issue.5, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/exs033

M. Bienvenu, On the complexity of consistent query answering in the presence of simple ontologies, Proc of AAAI, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00789141

E. Black, A. Hunter, and J. Z. Pan, An Argument-Based Approach to Using Multiple Ontologies, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM'09), pp.68-79, 2009.
DOI : 10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900

M. Caminada and L. Amgoud, On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.5-6, pp.286-310, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003

M. Chein and M. Mugnier, Graph-based Knowledge Representation and Reasoning? Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, 2009.

C. Chesnevar, J. Mcginnis, S. Modgil, I. Rahwan, C. Reed et al., Towards an argument interchange format, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.21, issue.04, pp.293-316, 2006.
DOI : 10.1017/S0269888906001044

J. Dix, S. Parsons, H. Prakken, and G. R. Simari, Research challenges for argumentation, Computer Science - Research and Development, vol.22, issue.1, pp.27-34, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s00450-009-0051-2

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, R. Rosati, M. Ruzzi, and D. F. Savo, Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics for Description Logics, Proc. of RR, pp.103-117, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-15918-3_9

M. Lenzerini, Data integration, Proceedings of the twenty-first ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems , PODS '02, 2002.
DOI : 10.1145/543613.543644

S. J. Modgil and H. Prakken, A general account of argumentation with preferences, Artificial Intelligence, vol.195, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.008

I. Rahwan, F. Zablith, and C. Reed, Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.10-15, pp.10-15897, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.015

S. Vesic, Maxi-consistent operators in argumentation, 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'12), pp.810-815, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00868350

S. Vesic and L. Van-der-torre, Beyond Maxi-Consistent Argumentation Operators, 13th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA'12), pp.424-436, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-017-0460-1_4