L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol, Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.29, issue.2, pp.125-169, 2002.

L. Amgoud, C. Cayrol, and D. Leberre, Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning, ICTAI 1996, pp.400-403, 1996.

T. J. Bench-capon, Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.13, issue.3, pp.429-448, 2003.

W. Bossert, Preference extension rules for ranking sets of alternatives with a fixed cardinality, Theory and Decision, vol.39, pp.301-317, 1995.

N. Bulling, J. Dix, and C. Chesñevar, Modelling coalitions: Atl + argumentation, pp.681-688, 2008.

G. Choquet, Theory of capacities, Annales de l'Institut Fourier, vol.5, pp.131-295, 1953.

S. Coste-marquis, S. Konieczny, P. Marquis, and M. Ouali, Weighted attacks in argumentation frameworks, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00866890

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, pp.321-357, 1995.

P. E. Dunne, A. Hunter, P. Mcburney, S. Parsons, and M. Wooldridge, Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems, pp.851-858, 2009.

M. Grabisch, The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.89, pp.445-456, 1996.

M. Grabisch and C. Labreuche, A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid, Annals of Operation Research, vol.175, pp.247-286, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00496558

S. Kaci, Refined preference-based argumentation frameworks, COMMA, pp.299-310, 2010.

S. Kaci and C. Labreuche, Arguing with valued preference relations, ECSQARU 2011, vol.6717, pp.62-73, 2011.

S. Kaci and L. Van-der-torre, Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.48, pp.730-751, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00800647

E. Klement, R. Mesiar, and E. Pap, , 2000.

D. H. Krantz, R. D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky, Foundations of measurement, Additive and Polynomial Representations, vol.1, 1971.

C. Labreuche and M. Grabisch, The Choquet integral for the aggregation of interval scales in multicriteria decision making, Fuzzy Sets & Systems, vol.137, pp.11-26, 2003.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00272090

J. Marichal, An axiomatic approach of the discrete Choquet integral as a tool to aggregate interacting criteria, IEEE Tr. on Fuzzy Systems, vol.8, issue.6, pp.800-807, 2000.

D. C. Martínez, A. J. García, and G. R. Simari, An abstract argumentation framework with varied-strength attacks, pp.135-144, 2008.

D. C. Martínez, A. J. García, and G. R. Simari, Strong and weak forms of abstract argument defense, COMMA, pp.216-227, 2008.

S. H. Nielsen and S. Parsons, A generalization of dung's abstract framework for argumentation: Arguing with sets of attacking arguments, ArgMAS 2006, vol.4766, pp.54-73, 2007.

H. Prakken, A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning, pp.85-94, 2005.

A. Roth, The college admissions problem is not equivalent to the marriage problem, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.36, pp.277-288, 1985.

G. R. Simari and R. P. Loui, A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation, Artificial Intelligence, vol.53, pp.125-157, 1992.