Introducing Preference-Based Argumentation to Inconsistent Ontological Knowledge Bases - LIRMM - Laboratoire d’Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier
Conference Papers Year : 2015

Introducing Preference-Based Argumentation to Inconsistent Ontological Knowledge Bases

Abstract

Handling inconsistency is an inherent part of decision making in traditional agri-food chains – due to the various concerns involved. In order to explain the source of inconsistency and represent the existing conflicts in the ontological knowledge base, argumentation theory can be used. However, the current state of art methodology does not allow to take into account the level of significance of the knowledge expressed by the various ontological knowledge sources. We propose to use preferences in order to model those differences between formulas and evaluate our proposal practically by implementing it within the INRA platform and showing a use case using this formalism in a bread making decision support system.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2015_PRIMA.pdf (99.7 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Files produced by the author(s)

Dates and versions

lirmm-01242937 , version 1 (14-12-2015)

Identifiers

Cite

Madalina Croitoru, Rallou Thomopoulos, Srdjan Vesic. Introducing Preference-Based Argumentation to Inconsistent Ontological Knowledge Bases. PRIMA: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, Oct 2015, Bertino, Italy. pp.594-602, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_42⟩. ⟨lirmm-01242937⟩
206 View
330 Download

Altmetric

Share

More