Introducing Preference-Based Argumentation to Inconsistent Ontological Knowledge Bases

Madalina Croitoru 1 Rallou Thomopoulos 1, 2 Srdjan Vesic 3
1 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
Abstract : Handling inconsistency is an inherent part of decision making in traditional agri-food chains – due to the various concerns involved. In order to explain the source of inconsistency and represent the existing conflicts in the ontological knowledge base, argumentation theory can be used. However, the current state of art methodology does not allow to take into account the level of significance of the knowledge expressed by the various ontological knowledge sources. We propose to use preferences in order to model those differences between formulas and evaluate our proposal practically by implementing it within the INRA platform and showing a use case using this formalism in a bread making decision support system.
Document type :
Conference papers
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-01242937
Contributor : Madalina Croitoru <>
Submitted on : Monday, December 14, 2015 - 12:36:35 PM
Last modification on : Friday, March 29, 2019 - 9:12:10 AM
Document(s) archivé(s) le : Saturday, April 29, 2017 - 12:49:57 PM

File

2015_PRIMA.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Madalina Croitoru, Rallou Thomopoulos, Srdjan Vesic. Introducing Preference-Based Argumentation to Inconsistent Ontological Knowledge Bases. PRIMA: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, Oct 2015, Bertino, Italy. pp.594-602, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_42⟩. ⟨lirmm-01242937⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

217

Files downloads

343