L. Amgoud, Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.55, issue.9, pp.2028-2048, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123709

L. Amgoud, Y. Dimopoulos, and P. Moraitis, Making decisions through preference-based argumentation, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning KR'08, vol.8, pp.963-970, 2008.

L. Amgoud and F. Saint-cyr, An axiomatic approach for persuasion dialogs, IEEE 25th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'13), pp.618-625, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01147295

M. Arenas, L. Bertossi, and J. Chomicki, Consistent query answers in inconsistent databases, Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, pp.68-79, 1999.

F. Baader, S. Brandt, and C. Lutz, Pushing the el envelope, Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'05), 2005.

J. Baget, M. Leclère, M. Mugnier, and E. Salvat, On rules with existential variables: Walking the decidability line, Artificial Intelligence, vol.175, issue.9, pp.1620-1654, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00587012

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, Elements of Argumentation, 2008.

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, Constructing argument graphs with deductive arguments: a tutorial, Argument & Computation, vol.5, issue.1, pp.5-30, 2014.

M. Bienvenu, On the complexity of consistent query answering in the presence of simple ontologies, Proceedings of AAAI'12 Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00789141

A. Calì, G. Gottlob, and T. Lukasiewicz, A general datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol.14, pp.57-83, 2012.

D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati, Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The dl-lite family, J. Autom. Reasoning, vol.39, issue.3, pp.385-429, 2007.

C. Cayrol, S. Doutre, and J. Mengin, On decision problems related to the preferred semantics for argumentation frameworks, Journal of logic and computation, vol.13, issue.3, pp.377-403, 2003.

C. Cayrol and M. , On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks, Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (EC-SQARU'05), pp.378-389, 2005.

M. Croitoru and S. Vesic, What can argumentation do for inconsistent ontology query answering?, Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM'13), pp.15-29, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00812630

S. Doutre and J. Mengin, On sceptical versus credulous acceptance for abstract argument systems, Logics in Artificial Intelligence, pp.462-473, 2004.

D. Phan-minh, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.

E. Paul, T. Dunne, and . Bench-capon, Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency, Artificial Intelligence, vol.149, issue.2, pp.221-250, 2003.

M. Elvang-gøransson, J. Paul, J. Krause, and . Fox, Acceptability of arguments as logical uncertainty, Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU'93), pp.85-90, 1993.

A. Eustis, Hypergraph Independence Numbers, 2013.

H. Jakobovits and D. Vermeir, Dialectic semantics for argumentation frameworks, Proceedings of the 7th International COnference on Artificial intelligence and Law, pp.53-62, 1999.

W. Mark, P. Johnson, S. Mcburney, and . Parsons, When are two protocols the same?', in Communication in Multiagent Systems, pp.253-268, 2003.

D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, R. Rosati, M. Ruzzi, and D. F. Savo, Inconsistency-tolerant semantics for description logics, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, RR'10, pp.103-117, 2010.

K. Lorenz, Basic objectives of dialogue logic in historical perspective, Synthese, vol.127, pp.255-263, 2001.

L. Deborah, P. Mcguinness, and . Schneider, Usability issues in knowledge representation systems, Proceedings of AAAI'98, pp.608-614, 1998.

S. Modgil and M. Caminada, Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks', in Argumentation in artificial intelligence, Guillermo Simari and Iyad Rahwan, pp.105-129, 2009.

M. Mugnier, M. Rousset, and F. Ulliana, Ontology-mediated queries for nosql databases, Proceedings of AAAI'16 Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01242913

A. Poggi, D. Lembo, D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, M. Lenzerini et al., Linking data to ontologies, Journal on data semantics X, pp.133-173, 2008.

H. Prakken, Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation, Synthese, vol.127, pp.187-219, 2001.

M. Phan, . Thang, M. Phan, N. Dung, and . Hung, Towards a common framework for dialectical proof procedures in abstract argumentation, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.19, issue.6, pp.1071-1109, 2009.

A. W. Gerard, H. Vreeswik, and . Prakken, Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics, Logics in Artificial Intelligence, pp.239-253, 2000.