Arguing About End-of-Life of Packagings: Preferences to the Rescue

Bruno Yun 1 Pierre Bisquert 1, 2 Patrice Buche 2, 1 Madalina Croitoru 1
1 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
Abstract : Argumentation methods and associated tools permit to analyze arguments against or in favor of a set of alternatives under discussion. The outputs of the argument methods are sets of conflict-free arguments collectively defending each other, called extensions. In case of multiple extensions, it is often difficult to select one out of many alternatives. We present in this paper the implementation of an complementary approach which permits to filter or rank extensions according to the expression of preferences. Methods and tools are illustrated on a real use case in food packagings. The aim is to help the industry choose among different end-of-life possibilities by linking together consumer behavior insights, socioeconomic developments and technical properties of packagings. The tool has been used on a real use-case concerning end-of-life possibilities for packag-ings.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [13 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-01401481
Contributor : Bruno Yun <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, November 23, 2016 - 2:27:01 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, November 19, 2019 - 1:19:03 AM
Long-term archiving on : Tuesday, March 21, 2017 - 7:35:55 AM

File

MTRSBruno.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Bruno Yun, Pierre Bisquert, Patrice Buche, Madalina Croitoru. Arguing About End-of-Life of Packagings: Preferences to the Rescue. MTSR: Metadata and Semantics Research, Nov 2016, Göttingen, Germany. pp.119-131, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-49157-8_10⟩. ⟨lirmm-01401481⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

513

Files downloads

508