L. Amgoud and H. Prade, Explaining qualitative decision under uncertainty by argumentation, Proceedings, The Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Eighteenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, pp.219-224, 2006.

L. Amgoud and S. Vesic, Two Roles of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks, Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty -11th European Conference Proceedings, pp.86-97, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-A

A. Arioua and M. Croitoru, Formalizing Explanatory Dialogues, SUM'2015: 9th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-23540-0_19
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01164705

A. Arioua and M. Croitoru, Dialectical characterization of consistent query explanation with existential rules, Proceedings of FLAIRS 2016, pp.621-625, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01328679

A. Arioua and M. Croitoru, A dialectical proof theory for universal acceptance in coherent logic-based argumentation frameworks, Proceedings of ECAI 2016, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01333368

M. Croitoru, R. Thomopoulos, and S. Vesic, Introducing Preference-Based Argumentation to Inconsistent Ontological Knowledge Bases, PRIMA 2015: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems -18th International Conference Proceedings, pp.594-602, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_42
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01242937

M. Croitoru and S. Vesic, What Can Argumentation Do for Inconsistent Ontology Query Answering?, Scalable Uncertainty Management -7th International Conference, SUM 2013 Proceedings, pp.15-29, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00936486

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-358, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

S. Kaci, Working with Preferences: Less Is More. Cognitive Technologies, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-17280-9
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00681057

S. Modgil and H. Prakken, framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial, Argument & Computation, vol.5, issue.1, pp.31-62, 2014.
DOI : 10.1080/19462166.2012.661766
URL : http://dspace.library.uu.nl:8080/handle/1874/304259

N. Tamani, P. Mosse, M. Croitoru, P. Buche, and V. Guillard, A Food Packaging Use Case for Argumentation, Metadata and Semantics Research -8th Research Conference. Proceedings, pp.344-358, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-13674-5_31
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01089612

N. Tamani, P. Mosse, M. Croitoru, P. Buche, V. Guillard et al., Ecoefficient packaging material selection for fresh produce: Industrial session, Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning -21st International Conference on Conceptual Structures Proceedings, pp.305-310, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-08389-6_27
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01089599

N. Tamani, P. Mosse, M. Croitoru, P. Buche, V. Guillard et al., An argumentation system for eco-efficient packaging material selection, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol.113, pp.174-192, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compag.2015.02.012
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01160802