A dialectical proof theory for universal acceptance in coherent logic-based argumentation frameworks, ECAI, pp.55-63, 2016. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01333368
Extending acyclicity notions for existential rules, ECAI, pp.39-44, 2014. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01092757
Graal: A Toolkit for Query Answering with Existential Rules, International Symposium on Rules 344, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-21542-6_21
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01172063
Formalizing Cognitive Acceptance of Arguments: Durum Wheat Selection Interdisciplinary Study, Minds and Machines, vol.39, issue.6, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11023-017-9424-7
Substantive irrationality in cognitive systems A review of current defeasible reasoning implementations A general datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies, Proceedings of ECAI 2016 Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, pp.227-26057, 2008. ,
On the influence of incoherence in inconsistencytolerant semantics for datalog±, 2015. ,
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, vol.4, issue.1+2, pp.95-138, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1017/S1471068403001674
Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.14, issue.5, pp.675-702, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/14.5.675
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.9.4902
EFFICIENT DEFEASIBLE REASONING SYSTEMS, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, vol.3, issue.04, pp.483-501, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0743-1066(89)90009-5
Inconsistency-Tolerant Reasoning in Datalog $$^{\pm }$$ ?? Ontologies via an Argumentative Semantics, IB- ERAMIA 2014, pp.15-27, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-12027-0_2
Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.53, issue.1993, pp.25-75, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.8.3814
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments, Argument & Computation, vol.4, issue.2, pp.93-124, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(96)00041-0
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.149.3092