M. Croitoru, A. Arioua, P. Buche, and R. Thomopoulos, Using explanation dialogue for durum wheat knowledge base acquisition, 2015.

L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons, An argumentationbased semantics for agent communication languages, Proceedings of ECAI 2002, 2002.

A. Arioua and M. Croitoru, Formalizing Explanatory Dialogues, SUM'2015: 9th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-23540-0_19

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01164705

A. Arioua and M. Croitoru, Dialectical characterization of consistent query explanation with existential rules, Proceedings of FLAIRS 2016, pp.621-625, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01328679

A. Arioua and M. Croitoru, A dialectical proof theory for universal acceptance in coherent logic-based argumentation frameworks, Proceedings of ECAI 2016, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01333368

G. Christopher and . Beevers, Cognitive vulnerability to depression: A dual process model, Clinical Psychology Review, vol.25, issue.7, pp.975-1002, 2005.

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, A logic-based theory of deductive arguments??????This is an extended version of a paper entitled ???Towards a logic-based theory of argumentation??? published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'2000), Austin, TX, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000., Artificial Intelligence, vol.128, issue.1-2, pp.203-235, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00071-6

P. Bisquert and M. Croitoru, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr, and Abdelraouf Hecham. Substantive irrationality in cognitive systems, Proceedings of ECAI 2016, 2016.

P. Bisquert, M. Croitoru, and F. Cyr, Towards a dual process cognitive model for argument evaluation (regular paper)

P. Bisquert, M. Croitoru, and F. Bannay, Towards a Dual Process Cognitive Model for Argument Evaluation, SUM: Scalable Uncertainty Management, volume LNCS of Scalable Uncertainty Management, pp.298-313, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-23540-0_20

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01164251

T. John, . Cacioppo, E. Richard, and . Petty, The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion Advances in Consumer Research, pp.673-675, 1984.

G. Andreacaì-i, T. Gottlob, and . Lukasiewicz, A general datalogbased framework for tractable query answering over ontologies, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, pp.57-83, 2012.

M. Chein, M. Mugnier, and M. Croitoru, Visual reasoning with graph-based mechanisms: the good, the better and the best, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.90, issue.03, pp.249-271, 2013.
DOI : 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500126

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00856811

P. Croskerry, G. Singhal, and S. Mamede, Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing, BMJ Quality & Safety, vol.94, issue.Suppl 2, pp.58-64, 2013.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672

D. Phan-minh, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, pp.321-357, 1995.

W. Dvorák, R. Pichler, and S. Woltran, Towards fixedparameter tractable algorithms for argumentation, In KR, pp.112-122, 2010.

S. Epstein, Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious., American Psychologist, vol.49, issue.8, p.709, 1994.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709

J. B. St, J. Evans, and . Curtis-holmes, Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning, Thinking & Reasoning, vol.11, issue.4, pp.382-389, 2005.

J. St, B. Evans, and K. E. Frankish, In two minds: Dual processes and beyond, 2009.

B. James and . Freeman, Acceptable premises: An epistemic approach to an informal logic problem, 2004.

I. Good, The probabilistic explication of information, evidence, surprise, causality, explanation, and utility. Foundations of statistical inference, pp.108-141, 1971.

A. Hecham, M. Croitoru, P. Bisquert, and P. Buche, Extending GWAPs for Building Profile Aware Associative Networks, Proceedings of ICCS 2016, pp.43-58, 2016.
DOI : 10.1145/1124772.1124784

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01328671

D. Kahneman, A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality., American Psychologist, vol.58, issue.9, pp.697-720, 2003.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697

M. Ross and Q. , Semantic memory, 1966.

K. Kraus and E. Sycara, Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation, Artificial Intelligence, vol.104, issue.1-2, pp.1-69, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00078-2

A. Herbert and . Simon, A behavioral model of rational choice. The quarterly journal of economics, pp.99-118, 1955.

A. Herbert and . Simon, From substantive to procedural rationality, 25 Years of Economic Theory, pp.65-86, 1976.

A. Steven and . Sloman, The empirical case for two systems of reasoning, Psychological Bulletin, vol.119, issue.1, p.3, 1996.

K. E. Stanovich, M. E. Toplak, and R. F. West, The Development of Rational Thought: A Taxonomy of Heuristics and Biases, Advances in Child Development and Behavior, pp.251-285, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/S0065-2407(08)00006-2

J. Douglas, T. , and J. Ott, Handbook of human genetic linkage, 1994.

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, vol.185, issue.4157, pp.1124-1131, 1974.
DOI : 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

D. Vannella, D. Jurgens, D. Scarfini, D. Toscani, and R. Navigli, Validating and Extending Semantic Knowledge Bases using Video Games with a Purpose, Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp.1294-1304, 2014.
DOI : 10.3115/v1/P14-1122

L. Von-ahn, Games with a Purpose, Computer, vol.39, issue.6, pp.92-94, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/MC.2006.196

D. Walton, C. Reed, and F. Macagno, Argumentation Schemes, 2008.

R. John, S. Wilson, and . Sharples, Evaluation of human work, 2015.