Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Logic-based argumentation with existential rules

Abdallah Arioua 1 Madalina Croitoru 2 Srdjan Vesic 3
2 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
Abstract : In this paper we are interested in the use of argumentation for handling inconsistency in inconsistent knowledge bases expressed with existential rules. We propose an instantiation of an argumentation framework and demonstrate it is coherent, relatively grounded and non-trivial, therefore satisfying the rationality postulates from the literature. We demonstrate how argumentation semantics relate to the state of the art of handling inconsistency in this setting, allowing us to propose the first dialectical proof in the literature for a given semantics.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Abdallah Arioua Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, January 7, 2021 - 9:48:22 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 20, 2021 - 9:58:20 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, April 8, 2021 - 6:31:10 PM


Files produced by the author(s)



Abdallah Arioua, Madalina Croitoru, Srdjan Vesic. Logic-based argumentation with existential rules. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Elsevier, 2017, 90, pp.76-106. ⟨10.1016/j.ijar.2017.07.004⟩. ⟨lirmm-01596666⟩



Record views


Files downloads