A. Arioua, M. Croitoru, and P. Buche, DALEK: A Tool for Dialectical Explanations in Inconsistent Knowledge Bases, COMMA, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01337019

A. Arioua, M. Croitoru, and S. Vesic, Logic-based argumentation with existential rules, Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, vol.90, pp.76-106, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01596666

F. Cerutti, P. E. Dunne, M. Giacomin, and M. Vallati, Computing Preferred Extensions in Abstract Argumentation: A SAT-Based Approach, TAFA 2013, pp.176-193, 2013.

M. Croitoru and S. Vesic, What Can Argumentation Do for Inconsistent Ontology Query Answering, SUM 2013, pp.15-29, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00936486

A. Hecham, A. Arioua, G. Stapleton, and M. Croitoru, An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01586155

J. Lagniez, E. Lonca, and J. Mailly, CoQuiAAS: A Constraint-Based Quick Abstract Argumentation Solver, ICTAI 2015, pp.928-935, 2015.

B. Yun, M. Croitoru, and P. Bisquert, Are Ranking Semantics Sensitive to the Notion of Core, AAMAS 2017, pp.943-951, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01605720

B. Yun, M. Croitoru, S. Vesic, and P. Bisquert, Graph Theoretical Properties of Logic Based Argumentation Frameworks: Proofs and General Results, GKR 2017, pp.118-138, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01892703

B. Yun, S. Vesic, M. Croitoru, P. Bisquert, and R. Thomopoulos, A Structural Benchmark for Logical Argumentation Frameworks, IDA 2017, pp.334-346, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01668017