L. Amgoud, Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems, Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, vol.55, issue.9, pp.2028-2048, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123709

A. Arioua and M. Croitoru, A dialectical proof theory for universal acceptance in coherent logic-based argumentation frameworks, Including Prestigious Applications of Artificial Intelligence (PAIS 2016), vol.29, pp.55-63, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01333368

A. Arioua, M. Croitoru, and P. Buche, DALEK: A tool for dialectical explanations in inconsistent knowledge bases, Computational Models of Argument-Proceedings of COMMA 2016, pp.461-462, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01337019

A. Arioua, P. Buche, and M. Croitoru, Explanatory dialogues with argumentative faculties over inconsistent knowledge bases, Expert Syst. Appl, vol.80, pp.244-262, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01596665

A. Arioua, M. Croitoru, and S. Vesic, Logic-based argumentation with existential rules, Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, vol.90, pp.76-106, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01596666

J. Baget, M. Michellecì-ere, E. Mugnier, and . Salvat, On rules with existential variables: Walking the decidability line, Artif. Intell, vol.175, issue.9, pp.1620-1654, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00587012

P. Baroni, M. Giacomin, and G. Guida, SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics, Artif. Intell, vol.168, issue.1-2, pp.162-210, 2005.

P. Baroni, M. Caminada, and M. Giacomin, An introduction to argumentation semantics, Knowledge Eng. Review, vol.26, issue.4, pp.365-410, 2011.

M. Bienvenu, On the Complexity of Consistent Query Answering in the Presence of Simple Ontologies, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00789141

P. Bisquert, M. Croitoru, F. Dupin-de-saint-cyr, and A. Hecham, Substantive irrationality in cognitive systems, Including Prestigious Applications of Artificial Intelligence (PAIS 2016), vol.29, pp.1642-1643, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01344696

G. Andreacaì-i, T. Gottlob, and . Lukasiewicz, A general datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies, Proceedings of the TwentyEigth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS 2009, pp.77-86, 2009.

M. Caminada and L. Amgoud, On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms, Artif. Intell, vol.171, issue.5-6, pp.286-310, 2007.

F. Cerutti, P. E. Dunne, M. Giacomin, and M. Vallati, Computing Preferred Extensions in Abstract Argumentation: A SAT-Based Approach, Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation-Second International Workshop, TAFA 2013, pp.176-193, 2013.

M. Croitoru and S. Vesic, What Can Argumentation Do for Inconsistent Ontology Query Answering?, Scalable Uncertainty Management-7th International Conference, SUM 2013, pp.15-29, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00936486

D. Phan-minh, On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games, Artif. Intell, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-358, 1995.

A. Sarah, S. Gaggl, and . Woltran, The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited, J. Log. Comput, vol.23, issue.5, pp.925-949, 2013.

A. Hecham, A. Arioua, G. Stapleton, and M. Croitoru, An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering, Description Logics, 30th International Workshop, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01586155

A. Hecham, M. Croitoru, and P. Bisquert, Argumentation-based defeasible reasoning for existential rules, Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, vol.2017, pp.1568-1569, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01520171

J. Lagniez, E. Lonca, J. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, R. Rosati et al., Coquiaas: A constraintbased quick abstract argumentation solver, Web Reasoning and Rule Systems-Fourth International Conference, RR 2010, Bressanone, pp.103-117, 2010.

M. Thimm, S. Villata, F. Cerutti, N. Oren, H. Strass et al., Summary Report of The First International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation, vol.37, p.102, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01332194

M. Thomazo and S. Rudolph, Mixing Materialization and Query Rewriting for Existential Rules, Including Prestigious Applications of Intelligent Systems (PAIS 2014), pp.897-902, 2014.

B. Yun and M. Croitoru, An argumentation workflow for reasoning in ontology based data access, Computational Models of Argument-Proceedings of COMMA 2016, pp.61-68, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01401316

B. Yun, M. Croitoru, and P. Bisquert, Are ranking semantics sensitive to the notion of core?, Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Proceedings of AAMAS 2017, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01605720

B. Yun, S. Vesic, M. Croitoru, P. Bisquert, and R. Thomopoulos, A structural benchmark for logical argumentation frameworks, Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01668017

B. Yun, M. Croitoru, S. Vesic, and P. Bisquert, A structural benchmark for logical argumentation frameworks, Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01668017

H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and J. You, Expressive Completeness of Existential Rule Languages for Ontology-Based Query Answering, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2016, pp.1330-1337, 2016.