L. Amgoud, Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems, Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, vol.55, issue.9, pp.2028-2048, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.004

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123709

L. Amgoud, P. Besnard, and S. Vesic, Equivalence in logic-based argumentation, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.24, issue.3, pp.181-208, 2014.
DOI : 10.1080/11663081.2014.959332

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123719

A. Arioua, P. Buche, and M. Croitoru, Explanatory dialogues with argumentative faculties over inconsistent knowledge bases, Expert Syst. Appl, vol.80, pp.244-262, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.009

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01596665

A. Arioua and M. Croitoru, A Dialectical Proof Theory for Universal Acceptance in Coherent Logic-Based Argumentation Frameworks, ECAI 2016, pp.55-63, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01333368

A. Arioua, M. Croitoru, and P. Buche, DALEK: A Tool for Dialectical Explanations in Inconsistent Knowledge Bases, COMMA 2016, pp.461-462, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01337019

A. Arioua, M. Croitoru, and S. Vesic, Logic-based argumentation with existential rules, Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, vol.90, pp.76-106, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2017.07.004

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01596666

J. Baget, S. Benferhat, Z. Bouraoui, M. Croitoru, M. Mugnier et al., A General Modifier-Based Framework for InconsistencyTolerant Query Answering, KR 2016, pp.513-516, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01328690

J. Baget, A. Gutierrez, M. Lecì-ere, M. Mugnier, S. Rocher et al., RuleML and OWL 2: Formats and Translations for Existential Rules, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01172069

J. Baget, A. Gutierrez, M. Lecì-ere, M. Mugnier, S. Rocher et al., DLGP: An extended Datalog Syntax for Existential Rules and Datalog+, 2015.

J. Baget, M. Lecì-ere, M. Mugnier, S. Rocher, and C. Sipieter, Graal: A Toolkit for Query Answering with Existential Rules, RuleML, pp.328-344, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-21542-6_21

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01172063

J. Baget, M. Lecì-ere, M. Mugnier, and E. Salvat, On rules with existential variables: Walking the decidability line, Artif. Intell, vol.175, issue.9, pp.1620-1654, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00587012

P. Baroni, M. Caminada, and M. Giacomin, An introduction to argumentation semantics, Knowledge Eng. Review, vol.26, issue.4, pp.365-410, 2011.
DOI : 10.1017/s0269888911000166

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, A logic-based theory of deductive arguments, Artif. Intell, vol.128, issue.1-2, pp.203-235, 2001.

A. Caì-i, G. Gottlob, and M. Kifer, Taming the Infinite Chase: Query Answering under Expressive Relational Constraints, J. Artif. Intell. Res, vol.48, pp.115-174, 2013.

A. Caì-i, G. Gottlob, and T. Lukasiewicz, A general datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies, PODS 2009, pp.77-86, 2009.

M. Croitoru, R. Thomopoulos, and S. Vesic, Introducing Preference-Based Argumentation to Inconsistent Ontological Knowledge Bases, PRIMA 2015, pp.594-602, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_42

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01242937

M. Croitoru and S. Vesic, What Can Argumentation Do for Inconsistent Ontology Query Answering?, SUM 2013, pp.15-29, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00936486

P. M. Dung, On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games, Artif. Intell, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-358, 1995.

S. A. Gaggl, A Comprehensive Analysis of the cf2 Argumentation Semantics: From Characterization to Implementation, 2013.

´. E. Grégoire, B. Mazure, and C. Piette, Boosting a Complete Technique to Find MSS and MUS Thanks to a Local Search Oracle, IJCAI 2007, pp.2300-2305, 2007.

A. Hecham, A. Arioua, G. Stapleton, and M. Croitoru, An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01586155

S. Modgil and H. Prakken, The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial, Argument & Computation, vol.5, issue.1, pp.31-62, 2014.

S. H. Nielsen and S. Parsons, Computing Preferred Extensions for Argumentation Systems with Sets of Attacking Arguments, COMMA 2006, pp.97-108, 2006.

S. Rocher, Interrogation tolérante aux incohérences, 2013.

B. Yun and M. Croitoru, An Argumentation Workflow for Reasoning in Ontology Based Data Access, COMMA 2016, pp.61-68, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01401316

B. Yun, M. Croitoru, and P. Bisquert, Are Ranking Semantics Sensitive to the Notion of Core?, AAMAS 2017, pp.943-951, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01605720

B. Yun, S. Vesic, M. Croitoru, P. Bisquert, and R. Thomopoulos, A Structural Benchmark for Logical Argumentation Frameworks, IDA 2017, pp.334-346, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01668017