Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems, Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, vol.55, issue.9, pp.2028-2048, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.004
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123709
Equivalence in logic-based argumentation, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.24, issue.3, pp.181-208, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1080/11663081.2014.959332
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123719
Explanatory dialogues with argumentative faculties over inconsistent knowledge bases, Expert Syst. Appl, vol.80, pp.244-262, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.009
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01596665
A Dialectical Proof Theory for Universal Acceptance in Coherent Logic-Based Argumentation Frameworks, ECAI 2016, pp.55-63, 2016. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01333368
DALEK: A Tool for Dialectical Explanations in Inconsistent Knowledge Bases, COMMA 2016, pp.461-462, 2016. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01337019
Logic-based argumentation with existential rules, Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, vol.90, pp.76-106, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2017.07.004
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01596666
A General Modifier-Based Framework for InconsistencyTolerant Query Answering, KR 2016, pp.513-516, 2016. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01328690
RuleML and OWL 2: Formats and Translations for Existential Rules, 2015. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01172069
DLGP: An extended Datalog Syntax for Existential Rules and Datalog+, 2015. ,
Graal: A Toolkit for Query Answering with Existential Rules, RuleML, pp.328-344, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-21542-6_21
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01172063
On rules with existential variables: Walking the decidability line, Artif. Intell, vol.175, issue.9, pp.1620-1654, 2011. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00587012
An introduction to argumentation semantics, Knowledge Eng. Review, vol.26, issue.4, pp.365-410, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1017/s0269888911000166
A logic-based theory of deductive arguments, Artif. Intell, vol.128, issue.1-2, pp.203-235, 2001. ,
Taming the Infinite Chase: Query Answering under Expressive Relational Constraints, J. Artif. Intell. Res, vol.48, pp.115-174, 2013. ,
A general datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies, PODS 2009, pp.77-86, 2009. ,
Introducing Preference-Based Argumentation to Inconsistent Ontological Knowledge Bases, PRIMA 2015, pp.594-602, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_42
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01242937
What Can Argumentation Do for Inconsistent Ontology Query Answering?, SUM 2013, pp.15-29, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00936486
On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games, Artif. Intell, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-358, 1995. ,
A Comprehensive Analysis of the cf2 Argumentation Semantics: From Characterization to Implementation, 2013. ,
Boosting a Complete Technique to Find MSS and MUS Thanks to a Local Search Oracle, IJCAI 2007, pp.2300-2305, 2007. ,
An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering, 2017. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01586155
The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial, Argument & Computation, vol.5, issue.1, pp.31-62, 2014. ,
Computing Preferred Extensions for Argumentation Systems with Sets of Attacking Arguments, COMMA 2006, pp.97-108, 2006. ,
Interrogation tolérante aux incohérences, 2013. ,
An Argumentation Workflow for Reasoning in Ontology Based Data Access, COMMA 2016, pp.61-68, 2016. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01401316
Are Ranking Semantics Sensitive to the Notion of Core?, AAMAS 2017, pp.943-951, 2017. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01605720
A Structural Benchmark for Logical Argumentation Frameworks, IDA 2017, pp.334-346, 2017. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01668017