D. Aissaoui, S. Genest, and . Loiseau, Cognitive Map of Conceptual Graphs: A Graphical Model to Help for Decision, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.2746, pp.337-350, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-45091-7_24

F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. L. Mcguinness, D. Nardi, and P. F. , The Description Logic Handbook, 2003.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511711787

J. F. Baget, RDF Entailment as a Graph Homomorphism, Proc. of ISWC'05, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11574620_9

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00922476

C. Bos, B. Botella, and P. Vanheeghe, Modeling and Simulating Human Behaviors with Conceptual Graphs, Proc. of ICCS'97, pp.275-289, 1997.

O. Carloni, M. Lecì, and M. Mugnier, Introducing Graph-Based Reasoning into a Knowledge Management Tool: An Industrial Case Study, IEA/AIE, pp.590-599, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/11779568_64

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00102684

L. Chauvin, D. Genest, and S. Loiseau, Contextual Cognitive Map, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.5113, pp.231-241, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-70596-3_16

M. Chein and M. Mugnier, Graph-based Knowledge Representation: Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00355336

M. Chein and M. Mugnier, Conceptual Graphs: Fundamental Notions. Revue d, Intelligence Artificielle, vol.6, issue.4, pp.365-406, 1992.

D. Genest and M. Chein, A content-search information retrieval process based on conceptual graphs, Knowledge and Information Systems, vol.29, issue.3, pp.292-309, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s10115-004-0179-0

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00105353

P. Hayes, RDF Semantics. W3C Recommendation, 2004.

H. Horst, Extending the RDFS Entailment Lemma, Proc. of the Third International Semantic Web ConferenceISWC'04, p.7791, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_7

S. Lalande, K. Staykova, M. Chein, A. Gutierrez, V. Saraydarova et al., Using Domain Knowledge to Speed up the Annotation of Digital Content with Conceptual Graphs, Cybernetics and Information Technology, vol.9, issue.3, pp.22-38, 2009.

F. Lehman, Semantics Networks in Artificial Intelligence, 1992.

M. Masterman, Semantic message detection for machine translation, using an interlingua, International Conference on Machine Translation of Languages and Applied Language Analysis, 1962.

N. Moreau, M. Lecì-ere, M. Chein, and A. Gutierrez, Formal and graphical annotations for digital objects, Proceedings of the 2007 international workshop on Semantically aware document processing and indexing, SADPI '07, pp.69-78, 2007.
DOI : 10.1145/1283880.1283893

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00194441

J. Novak and A. Canas, The Origins of the Concept Mapping Tool and the Continuing Evolution of the Tool, Information Visualization, vol.2, issue.3, pp.175-184, 2006.
DOI : 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500126

T. Raimbault, D. Genest, and S. Loiseau, A New Method to Interrogate and Check UML Class Diagrams, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3596, pp.353-366, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11524564_24

R. Richens, Programming for mechanical translation. Mechanical Translation, 3:Discontinued Journal, 1956.

S. Shapiro, Sneps: A logic for natural language understanding and commonsense reasoning, Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation: Language for Knowledge and Knowledge for Language, 2000.

S. Shapiro, The sneps semantic network processing system. In The representation and use of knowledge by computers, 1979.

M. Shaw and B. Gaines, Knowledge and requirements engineering, Proceedings of the 9th Banff Knowledge Accquisition For Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, 1995.

J. F. Sowa, Conceptual Graphs for a Data Base Interface, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol.20, issue.4, pp.336-375, 1976.
DOI : 10.1147/rd.204.0336

J. F. Sowa, On conceptual structures, Artificial Intelligence, vol.34, issue.3, 1984.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(88)90069-0

W. Woods and J. Schmolze, The KL-ONE family, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol.23, issue.2-5, pp.133-177, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0898-1221(92)90139-9

F. Baader, S. Brandt, and C. Lutz, Pushing the el envelope, Proc. of IJCAI 2005, 2005.

D. Calvanese, G. De-giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati, Tractable Reasoning and Efficient Query Answering in Description Logics: The DL-Lite Family, Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol.104, issue.1,2, pp.385-429, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s10817-007-9078-x

M. Lenzerini, Data integration, Proceedings of the twenty-first ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems , PODS '02, 2002.
DOI : 10.1145/543613.543644

M. Schmidt, T. Hornung, G. Lausen, and C. Pinkel, Sp2bench: A sparql performance benchmark . CoRR, abs/0806, 2008.

G. Boella and L. Van-der-torre, Permissions and obligations in hierarchical normative systems, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law , ICAIL '03, pp.109-118, 2003.
DOI : 10.1145/1047788.1047818

G. Boella and L. Van-der-torre, Institutions with a hierarchy of authorities in distributed dynamic environments, Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol.60, issue.1???4, pp.53-71, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10506-007-9059-8

W. Briggs and D. Cook, Flexible social laws, Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.688-693, 1995.

M. Chein and M. Mugnier, Graph-based Knowledge Representation: Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00355336

M. Croitoru, N. Oren, S. Miles, and M. Luck, Graph-Based Norm Explanation, Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVII, Proceedings of AI-2010: The Thirtieth SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp.35-48
DOI : 10.1007/978-0-85729-130-1_3

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00538437

M. Croitoru, L. Xiao, D. Dupplaw, and P. Lewis, Expressive security policy rules using Layered Conceptual Graphs, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol.21, issue.3, pp.209-216, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.knosys.2007.11.006

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.96.1884

J. Dibie-barthélemy, O. Haemmerlé, and E. Salvat, A semantic validation of conceptual graphs, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol.19, issue.7, pp.498-510, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.knosys.2005.04.002

G. Governatori, J. Hulstijn, R. Riveret, and A. Rotolo, Characterising Deadlines in??Temporal??Modal??Defeasible??Logic, Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI-2007), pp.486-496
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-76928-6_50

P. Groth, S. Miles, S. Modgil, N. Oren, M. Luck et al., Determining the Trustworthiness of New Electronic Contracts, Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Workshop on Engineering Societies in the Agents' World, pp.132-147, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-10203-5_12

]. R. Kowalski and M. J. Sergot, A logic-based calculus of events, New Generation Computing, vol.10, issue.No. 2, pp.67-95, 1986.
DOI : 10.1007/BF03037383

C. Krogh, The rights of agents, Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Intelligent Agents II: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, pp.1-16, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/3540608052_55

P. Mcnamara, Deontic logic The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2010.

S. Miles, P. Groth, and M. Luck, Handling mitigating circumstances for electronic contracts, Proceedings of the AISB 2008 Symposium on Behaviour Regulation in Multi-agent Systems, pp.37-42

M. L. Mugnier and M. Leclère, On querying simple conceptual graphs with negation, Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol.60, issue.3, pp.468-493, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.datak.2006.03.008

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00106650

N. Oren, M. Croitoru, S. Miles, M. Luck, J. Leite et al., Understanding Permissions through Graphical Norms, Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies VIII, 8th International Workshop, pp.167-184, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-20715-0_10

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.221.2917

N. Oren, S. Panagiotidi, J. Vazquez-salceda, S. Modgil, M. Luck et al., Towards a Formalisation of Electronic Contracting Environments, Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV, pp.156-171, 2008.
DOI : 10.1142/S0218843005001110

Y. Shoham and M. Tennenholtz, On social laws for artificial agent societies: off-line design, Artificial Intelligence, vol.73, issue.1-2, pp.231-252, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00007-N

J. F. Sowa, Conceptual Graphs for a Data Base Interface, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol.20, issue.4, pp.336-375, 1976.
DOI : 10.1147/rd.204.0336

R. Thomopoulos, J. R. Bourguet, B. Cuq, and A. Ndiaye, Short communication: answering queries that may have results in the future: a case study in food science, pp.491-495, 2010.

W. Woods and J. Schmolze, The KL-ONE family, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol.23, issue.2-5, pp.133-177, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0898-1221(92)90139-9

G. H. Wright, I. DEONTIC LOGIC, Mind, vol.LX, issue.237, pp.1-15, 1951.
DOI : 10.1093/mind/LX.237.1

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01268712

M. Croitoru, Graphical norms via conceptual graphs, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol.29, pp.31-43, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.06.025

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00763678

C. Boutilier and H. Holger, Bidding languages for combinatorial auctions, Proc. IJCAI'01, pp.1211-1217, 2001.

P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, Combinatorial Auctions, 2006.
DOI : 10.7551/mitpress/9780262033428.001.0001

M. Croitoru and S. Rudolph, Towards multi-agent knowledge allocation, LIRMM, p.2012
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00657422

A. Giovannucci, J. Rodriguez-aguilar, J. Cerquides, and U. Endriss, Winner determination for mixed multi-unit combinatorial auctions via petri nets, Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems , AAMAS '07, 2007.
DOI : 10.1145/1329125.1329253

N. Nisan, Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions, Proceedings of the 2nd ACM conference on Electronic commerce , EC '00, 2000.
DOI : 10.1145/352871.352872

D. Porello and U. Endriss, Modelling combinatorial auctions in linear logic, Proc. KR'10, 2010.

H. R. Varian, Buying, Sharing and Renting Information Goods, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.48, issue.4, pp.473-488, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6451.00133

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.52.7677

F. Linde and W. Stock, Information Markets: A Strategic Guideline for the I-Commerce, 2011.

S. F. Stahl, F. , and G. Vossen, Marketplaces for data: An initial survey, 2012.

P. Koutris, P. Upadhyaya, M. Balazinska, B. Howe, and D. Suciu, Query-based data pricing, pp.167-178, 2012.

C. Li, D. Y. Li, G. Miklau, and D. Suciu, A theory of pricing private data, pp.33-44, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00878866

V. Krishna, Auction theory, 2002.

O. Shehory and E. Dror, Computationally efficient and revenue optimized auctioneer's strategy for expanding auctions, Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems , AAMAS '06, pp.1175-1182, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/1160633.1160845

M. Babaioff, R. Kleinberg, and R. Paes-leme, Optimal mechanisms for selling information, Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC '12, pp.92-109, 2012.
DOI : 10.1145/2229012.2229024

A. V. Goldberg, J. D. Hartline, A. Karlin, M. Saks, A. V. Wright et al., Competitive auctions, Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, pp.242-269, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2006.02.003

W. Vickrey, COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS, The Journal of Finance, vol.16, issue.1, pp.8-37, 1961.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x

R. 1. Amgoud and P. Besnard, Bridging the Gap between Abstract Argumentation Systems and Logic, International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM'09), pp.12-27, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-A

L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol, Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks, Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol.29, issue.2, pp.125-169, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1021603608656

J. Baget and M. Mugnier, The Complexity of Rules and Constraints, JAIR, vol.16, pp.425-465, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00268460

J. Baget, M. Mugnier, S. Rudolph, and M. Thomazo, Walking the complexity lines for generalized guarded existential rules, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial IntelligenceIJCAI'11), pp.712-717, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00618081

S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases, Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial intelligence (UAI'93), pp.411-419, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, Elements of Argumentation, 2008.
DOI : 10.7551/mitpress/9780262026437.001.0001

F. J. Bex, S. J. Modgil, H. Prakken, and C. Reed, On logical specifications of the Argument Interchange Format, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.23, issue.5, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/exs033

M. Bienvenu, On the complexity of consistent query answering in the presence of simple ontologies, Proc of AAAI, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00789141

E. Black, A. Hunter, and J. Z. Pan, An Argument-Based Approach to Using Multiple Ontologies, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM'09), pp.68-79, 2009.
DOI : 10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900

M. Caminada and L. Amgoud, On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.5-6, pp.286-310, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003

M. Chein and M. Mugnier, Graph-based Knowledge Representation and Reasoning? Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, 2009.

C. Chesnevar, J. Mcginnis, S. Modgil, I. Rahwan, C. Reed et al., Towards an argument interchange format, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.21, issue.04, pp.293-316, 2006.
DOI : 10.1017/S0269888906001044

J. Dix, S. Parsons, H. Prakken, and G. R. Simari, Research challenges for argumentation, Computer Science - Research and Development, vol.22, issue.1, pp.27-34, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s00450-009-0051-2

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, R. Rosati, M. Ruzzi, and D. F. Savo, Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics for Description Logics, Proc. of RR, pp.103-117, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-15918-3_9

M. Lenzerini, Data integration, Proceedings of the twenty-first ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems , PODS '02, 2002.
DOI : 10.1145/543613.543644

S. J. Modgil and H. Prakken, A general account of argumentation with preferences, Artificial Intelligence, vol.195, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.008

I. Rahwan, F. Zablith, and C. Reed, Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.10-15, pp.10-15897, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.015

S. Vesic, Maxi-consistent operators in argumentation, 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'12), pp.810-815, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00868350

S. Vesic, L. Van-der-torre, T. Arora, R. Ramakrishnan, W. Roth et al., Beyond maxi-consistent argumentation operators lirmm-00812630, version 1 -12 Explaining program execution in deductive systems, 13th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA'12) Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases, pp.424-436, 1993.

F. Baader, S. Brandt, and C. Lutz, Pushing the el envelope, Proc. of IJCAI 2005, 2005.

F. Baader, R. Peñaloza, and B. Suntisrivaraporn, Pinpointing in the description logic el, Advances in Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.4667, pp.52-67, 2007.

F. Baader and B. Suntisrivaraporn, Debugging snomed ct using axiom pinpointing in the description logic el+, In KR-MED, vol.410, 2008.

J. Baget, M. Mugnier, S. Rudolph, and M. Thomazo, Walking the complexity lines for generalized guarded existential rules, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial IntelligenceIJCAI'11), pp.712-717, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00618081

M. Bienvenu, On the complexity of consistent query answering in the presence of simple ontologies, Proc of AAAI, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00789141

A. Borgida, E. Franconi, I. Horrocks, D. L. Mcguinness, and P. F. Patel-schneider, Explaining ALC subsumption, Proceedings of the 1999 International Workshop on Description Logics, 1999.

A. Calì, G. Gottlob, and T. Lukasiewicz, A general datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eigth ACM SIGMOD- SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pp.77-86, 2009.

D. Calvanese, G. De-giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati, Tractable Reasoning and Efficient Query Answering in Description Logics: The DL-Lite Family, Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol.104, issue.1,2, pp.385-429, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s10817-007-9078-x

M. Chein and M. Mugnier, Graph-based Knowledge Representation and Reasoning? Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, 2009.

M. Croitoru and S. Vesic, What Can Argumentation Do for Inconsistent Ontology Query Answering?, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.8078, pp.15-29, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00936486

X. Deng, V. Haarslev, and N. Shiri, A framework for explaining reasoning in description logics, IN: PROCEEDINGS OF THE AAAI FALL SYMPOSIUM ON EXPLANATION- AWARE COMPUTING, pp.189-204, 2005.

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

A. Garc?a, C. I. Chesnevar, N. D. Rotstein, and G. R. Simari, An abstract presentation of dialectical explanations in defeasible argumentation, ArgNMR07, pp.17-32, 2007.

P. Godfrey, Minimization in Cooperative Response to Failing Database Queries, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, vol.06, issue.02, pp.695-149, 1997.
DOI : 10.1142/S0218843097000070

P. Godfrey, J. Minker, and L. Novik, An architecture for a cooperative database system, Applications of Databases, pp.3-24, 1994.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-58183-9_35

C. G. Hempel and P. Oppenheim, Studies in the Logic of Explanation, Philosophy of Science, vol.15, issue.2, pp.135-175, 1948.
DOI : 10.1086/286983

M. Horridge, B. Parsia, and U. Sattler, Explaining Inconsistencies in OWL Ontologies, Scalable Uncertainty Management, pp.124-137, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(87)90062-2

M. Horridge, B. Parsia, and U. Sattler, Justification Oriented Proofs in OWL, Proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web -Volume Part I, ISWC'10, pp.354-369, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-30227-8_35

D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, R. Rosati, M. Ruzzi, and D. F. Savo, Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics for Description Logics, Proc. of RR, pp.103-117, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-15918-3_9

T. Lukasiewicz, M. V. Martinez, and G. I. Simari, Inconsistency handling in datalog+/ontologies, ECAI, pp.558-563, 2012.

D. L. Mcguinness and A. T. Borgida, Explaining subsumption in description logics, Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence -Volume 1, IJCAI'95, pp.816-821, 1995.

A. Meliou, W. Gatterbauer, J. Y. Halpern, C. Koch, K. F. Moore et al., Causality in databases, IEEE Data Eng. Bull, vol.33, issue.3, pp.59-67, 2010.

A. Meliou, W. Gatterbauer, K. F. Moore, and D. Suciu, Why so ? or why no ? functional causality for explaining query answers, Proceedings of the Fourth International VLDB workshop on Management of Uncertain Data (MUD 2010) in conjunction with VLDB 2010, 2010.

S. Modgil and M. Caminada, Proof Theories and Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, Argumentation in artificial intelligence, pp.105-129, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_6

S. Schlobach, Debugging and Semantic Clarification by Pinpointing, Proceedings of the Second European Conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, ESWC'05, pp.226-240, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11431053_16

S. Schlobach and R. Cornet, Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies, Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI'03, pp.355-360, 2003.

D. Seselja and C. Strasser, Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates, Synthese, vol.118, issue.3, pp.2195-2217, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s11229-011-9964-y

L. Amgoud and H. Prade, Using arguments for making and explaining decisions, Artificial Intelligence, vol.173, issue.3-4, pp.413-436, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, Elements of Argumentation, 2008.
DOI : 10.7551/mitpress/9780262026437.001.0001

D. Bouyssou, D. Dubois, M. Pirlot, and H. Prade, Decision-making process ? Concepts and Methods, 2009.

D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati, Data complexity of query answering in description logics, Artificial Intelligence, vol.195, pp.260-270, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.003

M. Caminada and L. Amgoud, On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.5-6, pp.286-310, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003

S. Colucci, T. D. Noia, A. Ragone, M. Ruta, U. Straccia et al., Semantic Web Information Management, chapter 19 : Informative Top-k retrieval for advanced skill management, pp.449-476
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-04329-1_19

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

S. Modgil and H. Prakken, A general account of argumentation with preferences, Artificial Intelligence, vol.195, pp.361-397, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.008

H. Prakken, An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments, Argument & Computation, vol.4, issue.2, pp.93-124, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(96)00041-0

I. Rahwan and G. Simari, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 2009.

N. Tamani, M. Croitoru, and P. Buche, A viewpoint approach to structured argumentation. https://docs.google.com, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00936485

R. 1. Amgoud, L. Bodenstaff, M. Caminada, P. Mcburney, S. Parsons et al., Final review and report on formal argumentation system, 2006.

L. Amgoud and H. Prade, Using arguments for making and explaining decisions, Artificial Intelligence, vol.173, issue.3-4, pp.413-436, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006

URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, Elements of Argumentation, 2008.
DOI : 10.7551/mitpress/9780262026437.001.0001

D. Bouyssou, D. Dubois, M. Pirlot, and H. Prade, Decision-making process ? Concepts and Methods, 2009.

D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati, Data complexity of query answering in description logics, Artificial Intelligence, vol.195, pp.260-270, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.003

M. Caminada and L. Amgoud, On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.5-6, pp.286-310, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003

S. Colucci, T. D. Noia, A. Ragone, M. Ruta, U. Straccia et al., Semantic Web Information Management, chapter 19 : Informative Top-k retrieval for advanced skill management, pp.449-476, 2010.

S. Destercke, P. Buche, and V. Guillard, A flexible bipolar querying approach with imprecise data and guaranteed results. Fuzzy sets and Systems, pp.51-64, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00611940

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

H. Prakken, An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments, Argument & Computation, vol.4, issue.2, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(96)00041-0

I. Rahwan and G. Simari, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 2009.

N. Tamani and M. Croitoru, Fuzzy argumentation system for decision making. https://drive.google.com, INRIA LIRMM, 2013.

N. Tamani, M. Croitoru, and P. Buche, A Viewpoint Approach to Structured Argumentation, The Thirty-third SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp.265-271, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-02621-3_19

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00936485

N. Tamani, M. Croitoru, and P. Buche, Conflicting viewpoint relational database querying: an argumentation approach, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, p.2014, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01089139

Y. Wu, Between argument and conclusion. Argument-based approaches to discussion . Inference and Uncertainty, p.34, 2012.

L. Amgoud, S. Parsons, and L. Perrussel, An argumentation framework based on contextual preferences, Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied and Practical Reasoning, p.5967, 2000.

L. Amgoud and H. Prade, Using arguments for making and explaining decisions, Artificial Intelligence, vol.173, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2008.11.006

Z. Assaghir, A. Napoli, M. Kaytoue, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, Numeri- 29 ??? cal information fusion: Lattice of answers with supporting arguments, p.621628, 2011.

F. Baader, S. Brandt, and C. Lutz, Pushing the el envelope, Proc. of IJCAI, 2005.

J. Baget and E. Salvat, Rules Dependencies in Backward Chaining of Conceptual Graphs Rules, Conceptual Structures: Inspiration and Application , 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, p.102116, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/11787181_8

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00112669

T. J. Bench-capon, Persuasion in practical argument using valuebased argumentation frameworks, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.13, issue.3, p.429448, 2003.

T. J. Bench-capon, Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.13, issue.3, p.429448, 2003.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/13.3.429

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, Practical rst-order argumentation, Proc. of AAAI, p.590595, 2005.

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, Elements of Argumentation, 2008.
DOI : 10.7551/mitpress/9780262026437.001.0001

J. Bourguet, Contribution aux methodes d'argumentation pour la prise de decision, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00553266

J. Bourguet, R. Thomopoulos, M. Mugnier, and J. Abécassis, An articial intelligence-based approach to deal with argumentation 30 ??? applied to food quality in a public health policy, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.40, issue.11, p.45394546, 2013.

J. Bourguet, R. Thomopoulos, M. Mugnier, and J. Abécassis, An articial intelligence-based approach to deal with argumentation applied to food quality in a public health policy. Accepted for publication in: Expert Systems With Applications, 2013.

J. Bourre, A. Bégat, M. Leroux, V. Mousques-cami, N. Pérandel et al., Valeur nutritionnelle (macro et micro-nutriments) de farines et pains fran??ais, M??decine et Nutrition, vol.44, issue.2, p.4976, 2008.
DOI : 10.1051/mnut/2008442049

D. Bouyssou, D. Dubois, M. Pirlot, and H. Prade, Decision-making process Concepts and Methods, 2009.

H. Brunelière, J. Cabot, G. Dupé, and F. Madiot, MoDisco, Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM international conference on Automated software engineering, ASE '10, pp.1012-1032, 2014.
DOI : 10.1145/1858996.1859032

/. Datalog+, A family of logical knowledge representation and query languages for new applications, p.228242

M. Caminada and L. Amgoud, On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.5-6, p.286310, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003

M. Chein and M. Mugnier, Graph-based Knowledge Representation and ReasoningComputational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, 2009.

M. Chein, M. Mugnier, and M. Croitoru, Visual reasoning with graphbased mechanisms: the good, the better and the best, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol.28, p.249271, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00856811

M. Croitoru and S. Vesic, What Can Argumentation Do for Inconsistent Ontology Query Answering?, Proc. of SUM 2013, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00936486

M. Dean, R. Sheperd, A. Arvola, P. Lampila, L. Lahteenmaki et al., Report on consumer expectations of health benets of modied cereal products, 2007.

S. Dubuisson-quellier, De la routine à la délibération. les arbitrages des consommateurs en situation d'achat, Réseaux, vol.135136, p.253284, 2006.

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

A. J. García and G. R. Simari, Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and practice of logic programming 4, p.95138, 2004.

S. Kaci and L. Van-der-torre, Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.48, issue.3, p.730751, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2007.07.005

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00800647

S. Klarman, U. Endriss, and S. Schlobach, Abox abduction in the description logic alc, J. Autom. Reasoning, vol.46, issue.1, p.4380, 2011.

M. Konig, M. Leclere, M. Mugnier, and M. Thomazo, A Sound and Complete Backward Chaining Algorithm for Existential Rules, Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, pp.122-138, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-33203-6_10

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00764341

T. Layat, Place du pain dans l'équilibre alimentaire, Pratiques en nutrition, vol.7, issue.26, p.4550, 2011.

J. Muller and A. Hunter, An Argumentation-Based Approach for Decision Making, 2012 IEEE 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, p.564571, 2012.
DOI : 10.1109/ICTAI.2012.82

N. Perrot, I. Trelea, C. Baudrit, G. Trystram, and P. Bourgine, Modelling and analysis of complex food systems: State of the art and new trends, Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol.22, issue.6, p.314, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.03.008

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01000973

I. Rahwan and G. Simari, Argumentation in Articial Intelligence, 2009.

J. Slavin and H. Green, Diatery bre and satiety, British Nutrition Foundation, vol.32, issue.1, p.3242, 2007.

R. Thomopoulos, B. Charnomordic, B. Cuq, and J. Abécassis, Articial intelligence-based decision support system to manage quality of durum wheat products, Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, vol.1, issue.3, p.179190, 2009.

]. A. Arioua, N. Tamani, and M. Croitoru, On Conceptual Graphs and Explanation of Query Answering under Inconsistency, Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference of Conceptual Structures (ICCS), volume LNAI 8577, pp.51-64, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-08389-6_6

M. Bienvenu, On the complexity of consistent query answering in the presence of simple ontologies, Proc of AAAI, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00789141

M. Bienvenu and R. Rosati, Tractable approximations of consistent query answering for robust ontologybased data access, Proceedings of IJCAI'13, pp.775-781, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00947531

A. Borgida, D. Calvanese, and M. Rodriguez-muro, Explanation in the DL-Lite Family of Description Logics, On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008, pp.1440-1457, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-88873-4_35

A. Calì, G. Gottlob, and T. Lukasiewicz, A general datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, pp.57-83, 2012.

D. Calvanese, M. Ortiz, M. ?imkus, and G. Stefanoni, Reasoning about explanations for negative query answers in dl-lite, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol.48, pp.635-669, 2013.

M. Caminada and L. Amgoud, On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, issue.5-6, pp.286-310, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003

M. Croitoru and S. Vesic, What Can Argumentation Do for Inconsistent Ontology Query Answering?, Scalable Uncertainty Management, pp.15-29, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_2

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00936486

D. Walton, A dialogue system specification for explanation, Synthese, vol.7, issue.2, pp.349-374, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s11229-010-9745-z

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-357, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

A. J. Garcia, C. I. Chesñevar, N. D. Rotstein, and G. R. Simari, Formalizing dialectical explanation support for argument-based reasoning in knowledge-based systems, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.40, issue.8, pp.403233-3247, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.036

D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, R. Rosati, M. Ruzzi, and D. F. Savo, Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics for Description Logics, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, pp.103-117, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-15918-3_9

T. Lukasiewicz, M. V. Martinez, and G. I. Simari, Complexity of Inconsistency-Tolerant Query Answering in Datalog+/???, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Ontologies, Databases, and Applications of Semantics, pp.488-500, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-41030-7_35

D. L. Mcguinness and P. F. Patel-schneider, Usability issues in knowledge representation systems, Proc. of AAAI-98, pp.608-614, 1998.

A. Poggi, D. Lembo, D. Calvanese, G. De-giacomo, M. Lenzerini et al., Linking Data to Ontologies, Journal on data semantics X, pp.133-173, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-77688-8_5

&. Cnrs-), . Sophia-antipolis, *. France, S. Abes-ananthakrishna, V. Chaudhuri et al., France References 1 Eliminating fuzzy duplicates in data warehouses, Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB '02, pp.586-597, 2002.

A. Arasu, C. Ré, and D. Suciu, Large-Scale Deduplication with Constraints Using Dedupalog, 2009 IEEE 25th International Conference on Data Engineering, pp.952-963, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/ICDE.2009.43

N. Bansal, A. Blum, and S. Chawla, Correlation clustering, pp.89-113, 2004.

I. Bhattacharya and L. Getoor, Entity Resolution in Graphs, pp.311-344, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/9780470073049.ch13

M. Bilenko, S. Basil, and M. Sahami, Adaptive Product Normalization: Using Online Learning for Record Linkage in Comparison Shopping, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'05), p.8, 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/ICDM.2005.18

P. Bouquet, H. Stoermer, and B. Bazzanella, An Entity Name System (ENS) for the Semantic Web, Proceedings of the 5th European semantic web conference on The semantic web: research and applications, ESWC'08, pp.258-272, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-68234-9_21

S. Chaudhuri, V. Ganti, and R. Motwani, Robust Identification of Fuzzy Duplicates, 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'05), pp.865-876, 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/ICDE.2005.125

M. Croitoru, L. Guizol, and M. Leclère, On Link Validity in Bibliographic Knowledge Bases, IPMU'2012: 14th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, volume Advances on Computational Intelligence, pp.380-389, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31709-5_39

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00763664

W. Fan, Dependencies revisited for improving data quality, Proceedings of the twenty-seventh ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems , PODS '08, pp.159-170, 2008.
DOI : 10.1145/1376916.1376940

A. Guénoche, Partitions optimizing different criteria: evaluation and comparison, Math??matiques et sciences humaines, issue.161, 2003.
DOI : 10.4000/msh.2879

L. Guizol, M. Croitoru, and M. Leclere, Aggregation Semantics for Link Validity, AI-2013: Thirty-third SGAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-02621-3_27

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00921018

R. Gupta and S. Sarawagi, Answering table augmentation queries from unstructured lists on the web, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, pp.289-300, 2009.
DOI : 10.14778/1687627.1687661

V. I. Levenshtein, Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals, Soviet physics doklady, p.707, 1966.

F. Saïs, N. Pernelle, and M. Rousset, Reconciliation de references : une approche logique adaptee aux grands volumes de donnees, EGC, pp.623-634, 2007.

S. Wang, Existence of a pareto equilibrium, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol.1, issue.2, pp.373-384, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00940586

W. E. Winkler, Overview of record linkage and current research directions, BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, 2006.