Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Towards a dual process cognitive model for argument evaluation

Florence Dupin de Saint Cyr 1 Pierre Bisquert 2, 3 Madalina Croitoru 2 Florence Dupin de Saint Cyr - Bannay 1
1 IRIT-ADRIA - Argumentation, Décision, Raisonnement, Incertitude et Apprentissage
IRIT - Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse
2 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
Abstract : In this paper we are interested in the computational and formal analysis of the persuasive impact that an argument can produce on a human agent. We propose a dual process cognitive computational model based on the highly influential work of Kahneman and investigate its reasoning mechanisms in the context of argument evaluation. This formal model is a first attempt to take a greater account of human reasoning and is a first step to a better understanding of persuasion processes as well as human argumentative strategies, which is crucial in collective decision making domain.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Pierre Bisquert Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, June 16, 2015 - 2:25:01 PM
Last modification on : Monday, October 11, 2021 - 1:24:30 PM



Florence Dupin de Saint Cyr, Pierre Bisquert, Madalina Croitoru, Florence Dupin de Saint Cyr - Bannay. Towards a dual process cognitive model for argument evaluation. 9th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2015), Sep 2015, Quebec City, Canada. pp.298-313, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-23540-0_20⟩. ⟨lirmm-01164251⟩



Record views