Towards a dual process cognitive model for argument evaluation

Abstract : In this paper we are interested in the computational and formal analysis of the persuasive impact that an argument can produce on a human agent. We propose a dual process cognitive computational model based on the highly influential work of Kahneman and investigate its reasoning mechanisms in the context of argument evaluation. This formal model is a first attempt to take a greater account of human reasoning and is a first step to a better understanding of persuasion processes as well as human argumentative strategies, which is crucial in collective decision making domain.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas
Contributor : Pierre Bisquert <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, June 16, 2015 - 2:25:01 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, June 25, 2019 - 1:27:02 AM



Pierre Bisquert, Madalina Croitoru, Florence Dupin de Saint Cyr - Bannay. Towards a dual process cognitive model for argument evaluation. SUM: Scalable Uncertainty Management, Sep 2015, Quebec City, Canada. pp.298-313, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-23540-0_20⟩. ⟨lirmm-01164251⟩



Record views