Four Ways to Evaluate Arguments According to Agent Engagement - LIRMM - Laboratoire d’Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2015

Four Ways to Evaluate Arguments According to Agent Engagement

Abstract

In this paper we are interested in the computational and formal analysis of the persuasive impact that an argument can have on a human. We present a preliminary account of the listener mental process (representation and reasoning mechanisms of the dual process cognitive model) as well as her engagement based on the ELM model. This engagement determines the reasoning process that the agent will adopt in order to evaluate and incorporate the uttered argument.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Draft_BI_bisquert_croitoru_dupin.pdf (241.33 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

lirmm-01245121 , version 1 (16-12-2015)

Identifiers

Cite

Pierre Bisquert, Madalina Croitoru, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr. Four Ways to Evaluate Arguments According to Agent Engagement. 8th International Conference on Brain Informatics and Health (BIH 2015), Aug 2015, London, United Kingdom. pp.445-456, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-23344-4_43⟩. ⟨lirmm-01245121⟩
713 View
519 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More