Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Four Ways to Evaluate Arguments According to Agent Engagement

Pierre Bisquert 1, 2 Madalina Croitoru 2 Florence Dupin de Saint Cyr - Bannay 3
2 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
3 IRIT-ADRIA - Argumentation, Décision, Raisonnement, Incertitude et Apprentissage
IRIT - Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse
Abstract : In this paper we are interested in the computational and formal analysis of the persuasive impact that an argument can have on a human. We present a preliminary account of the listener mental process (representation and reasoning mechanisms of the dual process cognitive model) as well as her engagement based on the ELM model. This engagement determines the reasoning process that the agent will adopt in order to evaluate and incorporate the uttered argument.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [24 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Pierre Bisquert <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - 5:11:40 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, March 18, 2021 - 2:25:03 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, April 29, 2017 - 4:57:02 PM


Files produced by the author(s)



Pierre Bisquert, Madalina Croitoru, Florence Dupin de Saint Cyr - Bannay. Four Ways to Evaluate Arguments According to Agent Engagement. BIH: Brain Informatics and Health, Aug 2015, London, United Kingdom. pp.445-456, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-23344-4_43⟩. ⟨lirmm-01245121⟩



Record views


Files downloads