An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering - LIRMM - Laboratoire d’Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2017

An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering

Abstract

In this paper we answer empirically the following research question: " Are dialectical explanation methods more effective than one-shot explanation methods for Intersection of Closed Repairs inconsistency tolerant semantics in existential rules knowledge bases? " We ran two experiments with 84 and respectively 38 participants and showed that under certain conditions dialectical approaches are significantly more effective than one-shot explanations.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
DL17.pdf (232.48 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

lirmm-01586155 , version 1 (12-09-2017)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : lirmm-01586155 , version 1

Cite

Abdelraouf Hecham, Abdallah Arioua, Gem Stapleton, Madalina Croitoru. An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering. DL: Description Logics, Jul 2017, Montpellier, France. ⟨lirmm-01586155⟩
329 View
77 Download

Share

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More