An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering

Abdelraouf Hecham 1 Abdallah Arioua 1, 2 Gem Stapleton 3 Madalina Croitoru 1
1 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
Abstract : In this paper we answer empirically the following research question: " Are dialectical explanation methods more effective than one-shot explanation methods for Intersection of Closed Repairs inconsistency tolerant semantics in existential rules knowledge bases? " We ran two experiments with 84 and respectively 38 participants and showed that under certain conditions dialectical approaches are significantly more effective than one-shot explanations.
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [19 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-01586155
Contributor : Abdelraouf Hecham <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, September 12, 2017 - 3:05:39 PM
Last modification on : Monday, November 18, 2019 - 3:33:56 PM
Long-term archiving on : Wednesday, December 13, 2017 - 4:49:49 PM

File

DL17.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : lirmm-01586155, version 1

Collections

Citation

Abdelraouf Hecham, Abdallah Arioua, Gem Stapleton, Madalina Croitoru. An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering. DL: Description Logics, Jul 2017, Montpellier, France. ⟨lirmm-01586155⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

369

Files downloads

60