Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Walking the Decidability Line for Rules with Existential Variables

Jean-François Baget 1 Michel Leclère 1 Marie-Laure Mugnier 1 
1 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
Abstract : We consider positive rules in which the conclusion may contain existentially quantified variables, which makes reasoning tasks (such as Deduction) undecidable. These rules, called forall-exist-rules, have the same logical form as TGD (tuple generating dependencies) in databases and as conceptual graph rules. The aim of this paper is to provide a clearer picture of the frontier between decidability and non-decidability of reasoning with these rules. We show that Deduction remains undecidable with a single forall-exist--rule; then we show that none of the known abstract decidable classes is recognizable. Turning our attention to concrete decidable classes, we provide new classes and classify all known classes by inclusion. Finally, we study, in a systematic way, the question "given two decidable sets of forall-exist--rules, is their union decidable?", andprovide an answer for all known decidable cases except one.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Marie-Laure Mugnier Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, November 12, 2010 - 4:45:04 PM
Last modification on : Friday, August 5, 2022 - 3:03:00 PM


  • HAL Id : lirmm-00535780, version 1



Jean-François Baget, Michel Leclère, Marie-Laure Mugnier. Walking the Decidability Line for Rules with Existential Variables. KR: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, May 2010, Toronto, Canada. pp.466-476. ⟨lirmm-00535780⟩



Record views