Monotonic and Nonmonotonic Inference for Abstract Argumentation - LIRMM - Laboratoire d’Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier
Conference Papers Year : 2013

Monotonic and Nonmonotonic Inference for Abstract Argumentation

Abstract

We present a new approach to reasoning about the outcome of an argumentation framework, where an agent's reasoning with a framework and semantics is represented by an inference relation defined over a logical labeling language. We first study a monotonic type of inference which is, in a sense, more general than an acceptance function, but equally expressive. In order to overcome the limitations of this expressiveness, we study a non-monotonic type of inference which allows \emph{counterfactual} inferences. We precisely characterize the classes of frameworks distinguishable by the non-monotonic inference relation for the admissible semantics.
No file

Dates and versions

lirmm-00857793 , version 1 (04-09-2013)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : lirmm-00857793 , version 1

Cite

Richard Booth, Souhila Kaci, Tjitze Rienstra, Leon van Der Torre. Monotonic and Nonmonotonic Inference for Abstract Argumentation. FLAIRS: Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society, May 2013, St. Pete Beach, Florida, United States. pp.1-8. ⟨lirmm-00857793⟩
381 View
0 Download

Share

More