Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation

Argumentation for conflicting viewpoint relational database querying

Nouredine Tamani 1, 2 Madalina Croitoru 1
1 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
Abstract : Within the framework of the European project EcoBioCap, we model a real world use case aiming at conceiving the next generation of food packagings. The objective is to select packaging materials according to possibly con icting requirements expressed by the involved parties (food and packaging industries, health authorities, consumers, waste management authority, etc.). The requirements and user preferences are modeled by several ontological rules provided by the stake- holders expressing their viewpoints and expertise. Since several aspects need to be considered (CO2 and O2 permeance, interaction with the product, sanitary, cost, end of life, etc.) in order to select objects, an argumentation process can be used to express/reason about different aspects or criteria describing the packagings. We define then in this report an argumentation approach which combines a description logic (DLR-Lite) within ASPIC framework for relational database querying. The argumentation step is nally used to express and/or enrich a bipolar query employed for packaging selection.
Document type :
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [2 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Madalina Croitoru Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, December 9, 2013 - 3:24:48 PM
Last modification on : Friday, October 22, 2021 - 3:07:22 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Sunday, March 9, 2014 - 11:50:17 PM


Files produced by the author(s)


  • HAL Id : lirmm-00915967, version 1
  • PRODINRA : 314873


Nouredine Tamani, Madalina Croitoru. Argumentation for conflicting viewpoint relational database querying. RR-13037, 2013. ⟨lirmm-00915967⟩



Record views


Files downloads