Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats - LIRMM - Laboratoire d’Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue International Journal of Approximate Reasoning Année : 2014

Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats

Résumé

A Dung-style argumentation framework aims at representing conflicts among elements called arguments. The basic ingredients of this framework is a set of arguments and a Boolean abstract (i.e., its origin is not known) binary defeat relation. Preference-based argumentation frameworks are instantiations of Dung's framework in which the defeat relation is derived from an attack relation and a preference relation over the arguments. Recently, Dung's framework has been extended in order to consider the strength of the defeat relation, i.e., to quantify the degree to which an argument defeats another argument. In this paper, we instantiate this extended framework by a preference-based argumentation framework with a valued preference relation. As particular cases, the latter can be derived from a weight function over the arguments or a Boolean preference relation. We show under some reasonable conditions that there are “less situations” in which a defense between arguments holds with a valued preference relation compared to a Boolean preference relation. Finally, we provide some conditions that the valued preference relation shall satisfy when it is derived from a weight function.

Dates et versions

lirmm-01082087 , version 1 (12-11-2014)

Identifiants

Citer

Souhila Kaci, Christophe Labreuche. Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2014, 55 (9), pp.2004-2027. ⟨10.1016/j.ijar.2013.12.001⟩. ⟨lirmm-01082087⟩
129 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More