Conflicting viewpoint relational database querying: an argumentation approach - LIRMM - Laboratoire d’Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2014

Conflicting viewpoint relational database querying: an argumentation approach

Abstract

Within the framework of the European project EcoBioCap, we model a real world use case aiming at conceiving the next generation of food packagings. The objective is to select packaging materials according to possibly conflicting requirements expressed by the involved parties (food and packaging industries, health authorities, consumers, waste management authority, etc.). The requirements and user preferences are modeled by several ontological rules provided by the stakeholders expressing their viewpoints and expertise. Since several aspects need to be considered (CO2 and O2 permeance, interaction with the product, sanitary, cost, end of life, etc.) in order to select objects, an argumentation process can be used to express/reason about different aspects or criteria describing the packagings. We define then in this paper an argumentation approach which combines a description logic (DLR-Lite) within ASPIC framework for relational database querying. The argumentation step is finally used to express and/or enrich a bipolar query employed for packaging selection.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
p1553.pdf (556.03 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

lirmm-01089139 , version 1 (01-12-2014)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : lirmm-01089139 , version 1
  • PRODINRA : 313776

Cite

Nouredine Tamani, Madalina Croitoru, Patrice Buche. Conflicting viewpoint relational database querying: an argumentation approach. AAMAS: Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, IFAAMAS/ACM, May 2014, Paris, France. pp.1553-1554. ⟨lirmm-01089139⟩
335 View
212 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More