A postulate-based analysis of comparative preference statements

Souhila Kaci 1 Namrata Patel 2
1 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
Abstract : There has been a growing interest in the study of preferences for their utility in solving problems related to decision making. Most of the preference representation languages developed in the literature are based on comparative preference statements since they offer a simple and intuitive way for expressing preferences. They can be further interpreted following different semantics, imparting a greater flexibility on how outcomes can be compared. So far the main objective has been to rank-order the set of outcomes given a set of comparative preference statements and one or several semantics. Tackling this problem from a different angle, we look into the behavioural aspects of the preference semantics and statements by attempting to formalise the intuition behind them using postulates studied in preference logics and non-monotonic reasoning. We select the postulates w.r.t. three criteria: coherence, syntax independence and inference. Thus, our analysis provides a means to determine those properties that are satisfied for a given preference semantics.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Journal of Applied Logic, Elsevier, 2014, 12 (4), pp.501-521. 〈10.1016/j.jal.2014.07.004〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-01089511
Contributeur : Souhila Kaci <>
Soumis le : lundi 1 décembre 2014 - 21:22:23
Dernière modification le : jeudi 24 mai 2018 - 15:59:22

Lien texte intégral

Identifiants

Collections

Relations

Citation

Souhila Kaci, Namrata Patel. A postulate-based analysis of comparative preference statements. Journal of Applied Logic, Elsevier, 2014, 12 (4), pp.501-521. 〈10.1016/j.jal.2014.07.004〉. 〈lirmm-01089511〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

147