A postulate-based analysis of comparative preference statements

Souhila Kaci 1 Namrata Patel 2
1 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
Abstract : There has been a growing interest in the study of preferences for their utility in solving problems related to decision making. Most of the preference representation languages developed in the literature are based on comparative preference statements since they offer a simple and intuitive way for expressing preferences. They can be further interpreted following different semantics, imparting a greater flexibility on how outcomes can be compared. So far the main objective has been to rank-order the set of outcomes given a set of comparative preference statements and one or several semantics. Tackling this problem from a different angle, we look into the behavioural aspects of the preference semantics and statements by attempting to formalise the intuition behind them using postulates studied in preference logics and non-monotonic reasoning. We select the postulates w.r.t. three criteria: coherence, syntax independence and inference. Thus, our analysis provides a means to determine those properties that are satisfied for a given preference semantics.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-01089511
Contributor : Souhila Kaci <>
Submitted on : Monday, December 1, 2014 - 9:22:23 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, May 24, 2018 - 3:59:22 PM

Links full text

Identifiers

Collections

Relations

Citation

Souhila Kaci, Namrata Patel. A postulate-based analysis of comparative preference statements. Journal of Applied Logic, Elsevier, 2014, 12 (4), pp.501-521. ⟨10.1016/j.jal.2014.07.004⟩. ⟨lirmm-01089511⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

188