Argumentation based Preference Aggregation

Patricio Mosse 1, 2, *
* Corresponding author
2 GRAPHIK - Graphs for Inferences on Knowledge
LIRMM - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier, CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
Abstract : The objective of this research project is to aggregate the preferences of different stakeholders using argumentation in a Negotiation Phase. This is done in the context of a specific project, which is explained in this thesis. The aggregation of several stakeholders' preferences may incur into different conflicts due to differences in the needs of each stakeholder. This is where argumentation can be used in order to solve conflicts, as new information may appear and lead to changes in the preferences, even adding new preferences or removing old ones. The concept of Negotiation Phase is introduced in order to allow stakeholders to review their preferences, discuss, argue, and enter new information. As a result of this phase, preferences may be changed in order to solve conflicts, or we may find out that a conflict is not solvable by argumentation, leading to other solutions such as splitting a scenario in order to manage different choices separately.
Document type :
Reports
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [16 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-00735214
Contributor : Madalina Croitoru <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 - 3:04:52 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, April 18, 2019 - 6:30:03 PM
Long-term archiving on : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 - 8:20:09 AM

File

Mosse-MasterThesis.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : lirmm-00735214, version 1

Collections

Citation

Patricio Mosse. Argumentation based Preference Aggregation. [Research Report] RR-12018, LIRMM. 2012. ⟨lirmm-00735214⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

303

Files downloads

589